Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 19:10:34 GMT, Aaron Blacksmith
>The Nikon AF-S DX 55-200/4-5,6 G ED is priced surprisingly cheap, which
>makes med suspicious. Has anyone experience about it? How does it
>perform compared to other lenses in the same range (Nikon, Tamron,
If I only could get my hands on one of those, I would have told You.
The Sigma DC 55-200 is not a bad lens either, if you can't wait. The
biggest difference could be the AF-S (SWM - other brands call this
HSM and USM), but it seems it's not a 'real' SWM, only a