Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Brit magazine.
The Super CCD sensor is the best sensor type
out there, according to them. They compared it
to everything else including full frame Canon,
Foveon, 4/3rds, etc. Key advantages? Dynamic
range and colour rendition.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
RichA wrote:
> Brit magazine.
> The Super CCD sensor is the best sensor type
> out there, according to them. They compared it
> to everything else including full frame Canon,
> Foveon, 4/3rds, etc. Key advantages? Dynamic
> range and colour rendition.
>
Yeah... What's a little noise between friends?
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
RichA wrote:
> Brit magazine.
> The Super CCD sensor is the best sensor type
> out there, according to them. They compared it
> to everything else including full frame Canon,
> Foveon, 4/3rds, etc. Key advantages? Dynamic
> range and colour rendition.
If this is the sensor they use in the F10 it is very good indeed.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:26:33 +1000, Ryadia <just@the.group> wrote:
>RichA wrote:
>> Brit magazine.
>> The Super CCD sensor is the best sensor type
>> out there, according to them. They compared it
>> to everything else including full frame Canon,
>> Foveon, 4/3rds, etc. Key advantages? Dynamic
>> range and colour rendition.
>>
>Yeah... What's a little noise between friends?
>
>Douglas
They mentioned seeing white areas that were burned out
with other sensors that upon turning down the brightness
presented detail using the Fuji. Seems that noise
took a back seat to dynamic range.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
RichA wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:26:33 +1000, Ryadia <just@the.group> wrote:
>>Yeah... What's a little noise between friends?
>>
>>Douglas
>
> They mentioned seeing white areas that were burned out
> with other sensors that upon turning down the brightness
> presented detail using the Fuji. Seems that noise
> took a back seat to dynamic range.
But noise is -THE ONLY- thing we can care about! Anything else like dynamic
range, tonality or color rendition are useless details compared to
measuring noise at ISO800 and up.
--
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Stacey wrote:
[]
> But noise is -THE ONLY- thing we can care about! Anything else like
> dynamic range, tonality or color rendition are useless details
> compared to measuring noise at ISO800 and up.
Noise you can reduce in software, but not recover blown highlights....
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.