Some BF2 patch trouble update stuff (from slashdot)

Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)

Rasmus Dyhr Frederiksen <nospam@nospam.no> wrote:
>
>http://games.slashdot.org/games/05/07/11/1629258.shtml?tid=204
>
>regards,

Acutally... i have to reboot my linux server once a while (once 24h)
because it eats all rambut the games runs fine on client side....

ok i dont play 23 hours a day.. because i dont have time... but its ok for
me!
and the 1.01 patch was a big improvement (ase and server browser issues)

Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942,alt.games.ea.battlefield (More info?)

"Rasmus Dyhr Frederiksen" <nospam@nospam.no> wrote in message
news:42d3a8d6$0$32054$edfadb0f@dread15.news.tele.dk...
> http://games.slashdot.org/games/05 [...] ml?tid=204

The slashdot post is trying to claim the teammates appearing with red
nametags is new as of the patch? Huh? That bug was both in the demo and in
the 1.0 release.

Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942,alt.games.ea.battlefield (More info?)

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:23:39 +0200, Rasmus Dyhr Frederiksen wrote:

> Nonymous wrote:
>> "Rasmus Dyhr Frederiksen" <nospam@nospam.no> wrote in message
>> news:42d3a8d6$0$32054$edfadb0f@dread15.news.tele.dk...
>>
>>>http://games.slashdot.org/games/05/07/11/1629258.shtml?tid=204
>>
>> The slashdot post is trying to claim the teammates appearing with red
>> nametags is new as of the patch? Huh? That bug was both in the demo and in
>> the 1.0 release.
>
> Yeah. On closer scrutiny, the slashdot post and the article they
> referred to, are rather inaccurate.

Nothing new for /. then!

--
Omnix, PunksBusted Staff
Building a safer gaming community, one server at a time

e: omnix@punksbusted.com w: http://www.punksbusted.com