Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
It doesn`t work its buggy too. Not trying to sound bitchy but these
companies who put software on the market and its buggy should be charged
with knowingly selling defective software. Its not fair to their loyal
customers.
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
Wayne Reynolds wrote:
> It doesn`t work its buggy too. Not trying to sound bitchy but these
> companies who put software on the market and its buggy should be charged
> with knowingly selling defective software. Its not fair to their loyal
> customers.
>
>
It's not fair to their "loyal customers"? So, what then, it's fair to
the customers that aren't loyal? I think maybe you should fly off the
handle like that other idiot, maybe then you'd feel better (or not).
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
Non_Sequitur <Non_Sequitur@attbi.net> wrote:
>Wayne Reynolds wrote:
>> It doesn`t work its buggy too. Not trying to sound bitchy but these
>> companies who put software on the market and its buggy should be charged
>> with knowingly selling defective software. Its not fair to their loyal
>> customers.
>>
>>
>It's not fair to their "loyal customers"? So, what then, it's fair to
>the customers that aren't loyal? I think maybe you should fly off the
>handle like that other idiot, maybe then you'd feel better (or not).
You're so far up EA's anus you're doomed to end up in the bottom of their
shitter real soon.
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
"Non_Sequitur" <Non_Sequitur@attbi.net> wrote in message
news:hDjCe.4465$Ih7.1152@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> Wayne Reynolds wrote:
>> It doesn`t work its buggy too. Not trying to sound bitchy but these
>> companies who put software on the market and its buggy should be charged
>> with knowingly selling defective software. Its not fair to their loyal
>> customers.
> It's not fair to their "loyal customers"? So, what then, it's fair to the
> customers that aren't loyal? I think maybe you should fly off the handle
> like that other idiot, maybe then you'd feel better (or not).
What was the point of your reply? You pick apart the semantics of his post
then go on to slag him off. The OP had a point and made it politely.
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
Wayne Reynolds wrote:
> It doesn`t work its buggy too. Not trying to sound bitchy but these
> companies who put software on the market and its buggy should be charged
> with knowingly selling defective software. Its not fair to their loyal
> customers.
Dunno, but the new patch works fine for me !
Even the 64 player servers I played on last night had much less lag than
before.
Or maybe I was just a wee-bit drunker than usual ?
--
Jez, MBA.,
Country Dancing and Advanced Astrology, UBS.
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
Jack White reported to abuse@rr.com for violating his terms of use contract,
specifically for obscene and harassing behavior.
OPERATOR ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY
Your local Time Warner Cable affiliated cable operator ("Operator" )
seeks to create and foster an on-line community that can be used and enjoyed
by all its cable modem customers across all ISPs offered by Operator. To
further that goal, Operator has developed an Acceptable Use Policy.
Although much of what is included here is common sense, Operator takes these
issues very seriously and will enforce its rules to ensure enjoyment by all
of its members. Operator reserves the right to suspend or cancel a
subscriber's account for engaging in inappropriate conduct. (Subscribers,
of course, also remain legally responsible for any such acts.) In using the
services of any ISP as provided over Operator's cable network (the "ISP
Service" ), subscribers accept this non-exhaustive list of restrictions as
well as those set forth in Operator's Cable Modem Subscription Agreement and
agree to use the ISP Service only for lawful purposes and not to use or
allow others to use the ISP Service in violation of the following
guidelines:
a.. Unless you have specifically subscribed for commercial grade
service, the ISP Service is provided to you for personal, non-commercial use
only. The service cannot be used for any enterprise purpose whatsoever
whether or not the enterprise is directed toward making a profit. If it is
your intention to use this service for these purposes, please contact
Operator to inquire whether commercial grade service programs are available.
b.. The ISP Service may not be used to engage in any conduct that
interferes with Operator's ability to provide service to others, including
the use of excessive bandwidth.
c.. The ISP Service may not be used to breach or attempt to breach
the security, the computer, the software or the data of any person or
entity, including Operator, to circumvent the user authentication features
or security of any host, network or account, to use or distribute tools
designed to compromise security, or to interfere with another's use of the
ISP Service through the posting or transmitting of a virus or other harmful
item to deliberately overload or flood that entity's system.
d.. In using the ISP Service, you may not use an IP address or
client ID not assigned to you, forge any TCP/IP packet header or any part of
the header information in an e-mail or newsgroup posting or probe, scan or
test the vulnerability of any system or network by the use of sniffers, SNMP
tools or any other method.
e.. The ISP Service may not be used to post or transmit content that
violates child pornography statutes or contains graphic visual depictions of
sexual acts or sexually explicit conduct involving children, or other
depictions of children, the primary appeal of which is prurient.
f.. The ISP Service may not be used to upload, post, transmit or
otherwise make available any materials or content that violate or infringe
on the rights or dignity of others. These include, but are not limited to,
materials infringing or compromising intellectual property rights or the
ability to maintain trade secrets and other personal information as private;
the ability to avoid hate speech; threats of physical violence; harassing
conduct; sexually oriented material that is offensive or inappropriate; and
unsolicited bulk e-mail.
g.. The ISP Service may not be used to engage in or foster any
consumer fraud such as illegal gambling, "Make Money Fast" schemes, chain
letters, Pyramid, or other investment schemes, or to make or encourage
people to accept fraudulent offers by e-mail, USENET or other means, of
products, items or services, originating from your account, or through a
third party which implicates your account or to post or transmit off-topic
or commercial messages on bulletin boards.
h.. You may not engage in any of the above activities using the
service of another ISP, while channeling such activities through your ISP
Service account or using this account as a mail drop for responses.
"Jack White" <jackwhite@ncrr.com> wrote in message
news1ijd1h1jcqlbvh3d4urtba5chmsddoaqb@4ax.com...
> Non_Sequitur <Non_Sequitur@attbi.net> wrote:
>
>>Wayne Reynolds wrote:
>>> It doesn`t work its buggy too. Not trying to sound bitchy but these
>>> companies who put software on the market and its buggy should be charged
>>> with knowingly selling defective software. Its not fair to their loyal
>>> customers.
>>>
>>>
>>It's not fair to their "loyal customers"? So, what then, it's fair to
>>the customers that aren't loyal? I think maybe you should fly off the
>>handle like that other idiot, maybe then you'd feel better (or not).
>
> You're so far up EA's anus you're doomed to end up in the bottom of their
> shitter real soon.
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
JLT2005 wrote:
> Jack White reported to abuse@rr.com for violating his terms of use contract,
> specifically for obscene and harassing behavior.
>
> OPERATOR ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY
Woo! I'll bet you're a ton of fun at parties!
I didn't see exactly what part of the AU policy the poster failed to
comply with...?
I'm all about making the Internet a better place for everyone, but man,
you gotta pick your battles, and "telling on" everyone who posts a
dirty word online is going to drive you crazy real quick.
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
<aspragg@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1121727077.235610.237240@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> JLT2005 wrote:
>> Jack White reported to abuse@rr.com for violating his terms of use
>> contract,
>> specifically for obscene and harassing behavior.
>>
>> OPERATOR ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY
>
> I'm all about making the Internet a better place for everyone, but man,
> you gotta pick your battles, and "telling on" everyone who posts a
> dirty word online is going to drive you crazy real quick.
>
> Good luck!
> Adam
Ok.. a bit offtopic. But these kinda posts make me go this way. I'm not
something like a moderator or something. I'm just a guy with common sence.
And what I'v seen in the last couple of days most of the topics are starting
in somewhat like a 'I can flame best' contest. Sorry, but I think we'v got
to respect other peoples oppinions and not talk down in a way it sometimes
happen. At least, you may own me, rape my ass as much as you like.. I can
take it.. But some people don't know when to quit.
I stand behind JLT2005's opinion a 100% and to me, it has nothing to do with
'censorship' in anyways.. It also means we'v got to respect other peoples
opinions...
Sorry.. Had to post this
Archived from groups: alt.games.battlefield1942 (More info?)
hydlide wrote:
> <aspragg@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> Ok.. a bit offtopic. But these kinda posts make me go this way. I'm not
> something like a moderator or something. I'm just a guy with common sence.
> And what I'v seen in the last couple of days most of the topics are starting
> in somewhat like a 'I can flame best' contest. Sorry, but I think we'v got
> to respect other peoples oppinions and not talk down in a way it sometimes
> happen. At least, you may own me, rape my ass as much as you like.. I can
> take it.. But some people don't know when to quit.
>
> I stand behind JLT2005's opinion a 100% and to me, it has nothing to do with
> 'censorship' in anyways.. It also means we'v got to respect other peoples
> opinions...
> Sorry.. Had to post this
Hey, it is the usenet. Ignore non-topic stuff and reply to interesting
stuff. Quite a lot of helpful people are following the newsgroup.
Tit-for-tat flames and rants expires after a few days so just ignore them.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.