Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:41:44 +0100, Sam Lowry <No.Spam@Thank.You> wrote:
>Hi All
>
>Anybody know if Nikon VR lenses still do the VR magic if there is a
>multiplier between them and the body?
>
>This seems a good way to save money until I can afford some more expensive
>glass.
I can confirm that the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR does work fine with a Kenko 2x
teleconverter.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:39:35 -0400, in rec.photo.digital.slr-systems "Rita Ä
Berkowitz" <ritaberk2O04 @aol.com> wrote:
>Works like a champ with my 70-200 f/2.8 VR and TC-20E II as well.
Same here. I will point out this lens becomes a bit sluggish compared to
its stand alone stellar AF performance in my experience. Is your experience
the same Rita?
----------
Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Phot [...] index.html
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
Ed Ruf wrote:
> Same here. I will point out this lens becomes a bit sluggish compared
> to its stand alone stellar AF performance in my experience. Is your
> experience the same Rita?
It doesn't seem that much more noticeable with it in, but I do get the
occasional hunting that irritates me.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:41:44 +0100, Sam Lowry wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Anybody know if Nikon VR lenses still do the VR magic if there is a
> multiplier between them and the body?
>
> This seems a good way to save money until I can afford some more expensive
> glass.
>
> -SL
Thanks all for the replies, that's just what I wanted to hear.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.