Hi all. I've spent the last week, on and off, trying to get a good handle on the relationship between the following aspects of GPUs:
- Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)
- GFLOPS
- Pixel Fill Rate (MPixels/sec)
- Texture Fill Rate
The reason behind the research is to get a firm handle on whether the video card I'm looking at buying (and those I buy in the future) is really better than other models I'm looking at. For example, on the GPU Review website, when I compare the nVidia GTX 460 against the GTX 560, the 560 beats the 460 in all area except the GFLOPS. And since the 560 is a "younger card" and potentially about the same price second hand, I'm leaning in that direction.
I found some "real world" benchmarks on the Passmark site that indicate that the 560 is capable of scoring about 12% faster than the 460, but when I checked the "Last 5 baselines" sections for both cards, the difference was much less (mostly due to one baseline for the 560 being significantly lower - not sure what to make of that).
I'm currently on a Radeon HD 5770 1GB, but it is struggling a bit on my Core 2 Duo E6850 3GHz system with 4GB DDR2 800 RAM running W7 32-bit playing BF2 / AIX2. Both the 460 & the 560 appear to be significantly better performers than the 5770, and it appears that the BF2 game has been written with a "bias" towards nVidia cards / shaders / drivers etc.
So I don't want this to devolve into an AMD vs nVidia war - I'm actually pro-AMD, but have decided that if the game I play is going to run better on nVidia, so be it.
I'd appreciate thoughts, comments, links and such to help me sort through the technical aspects of comparing the 4 categories of information I listed above.
Cheers
- Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)
- GFLOPS
- Pixel Fill Rate (MPixels/sec)
- Texture Fill Rate
The reason behind the research is to get a firm handle on whether the video card I'm looking at buying (and those I buy in the future) is really better than other models I'm looking at. For example, on the GPU Review website, when I compare the nVidia GTX 460 against the GTX 560, the 560 beats the 460 in all area except the GFLOPS. And since the 560 is a "younger card" and potentially about the same price second hand, I'm leaning in that direction.
I found some "real world" benchmarks on the Passmark site that indicate that the 560 is capable of scoring about 12% faster than the 460, but when I checked the "Last 5 baselines" sections for both cards, the difference was much less (mostly due to one baseline for the 560 being significantly lower - not sure what to make of that).
I'm currently on a Radeon HD 5770 1GB, but it is struggling a bit on my Core 2 Duo E6850 3GHz system with 4GB DDR2 800 RAM running W7 32-bit playing BF2 / AIX2. Both the 460 & the 560 appear to be significantly better performers than the 5770, and it appears that the BF2 game has been written with a "bias" towards nVidia cards / shaders / drivers etc.
So I don't want this to devolve into an AMD vs nVidia war - I'm actually pro-AMD, but have decided that if the game I play is going to run better on nVidia, so be it.
I'd appreciate thoughts, comments, links and such to help me sort through the technical aspects of comparing the 4 categories of information I listed above.
Cheers