Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital SLR > Sony R1 images....er.....

Sony R1 images....er.....

Forum Digital Camera : Digital SLR - Sony R1 images....er.....

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
Rich   09-10-2005 at 05:03:42 AM

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Seems to be a bit of noise....

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/ [...] e=14973880

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Anonymous   09-10-2005 at 09:27:30 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

In message <k7j4i19bhql7gpv5tlbl4q9gr3p50rjp37@4ax.com>,
Rich <none@none.com> wrote:

>Seems to be a bit of noise....
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=14973880

Were they under-exposed?

Was the saturation boosted?
--

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   09-10-2005 at 10:27:50 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

In article <9gk4i1tkgh7osnf2dbddpue18gusodsk69@4ax.com>, JPS@no.komm
says...
> In message <k7j4i19bhql7gpv5tlbl4q9gr3p50rjp37@4ax.com>,
> Rich <none@none.com> wrote:
>
> >Seems to be a bit of noise....
> >
> >http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=14973880
>
> Were they under-exposed?
>
> Was the saturation boosted?

Looks like the same thing the D2X had before release.

Of course, the D2X ended up producing cleaner images in the end - chalk
it up to pre-production firmware, I guess.
--
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird

Reply to Anonymous
Slack   09-10-2005 at 05:03:43 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Rich wrote:
> Seems to be a bit of noise....
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/ [...] e=14973880


Should've used one of those plastic Canon XT things.
--
Slack

Reply to Slack
Charles   09-10-2005 at 10:35:27 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:03:42 -0400, Rich <none@none.com> wrote:

>Seems to be a bit of noise....
>
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=14973880


Must be the plastic.

Reply to Charles
Anonymous   09-10-2005 at 11:45:47 AM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Rich wrote:
> Seems to be a bit of noise....
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/ [...] e=14973880

Meaningless without the originals. Bear in mind that /all/ cameras have
noise, it's fundamental to the nature of light.

David

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   09-10-2005 at 01:40:31 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

"David J Taylor"
<david-taylor@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk.invalid> wrote in
message news:fquUe.105873$G8.59673@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Rich wrote:
>> Seems to be a bit of noise....
>>
>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/ [...] e=14973880
>
> Meaningless without the originals. Bear in mind that /all/ cameras have
> noise, it's fundamental to the nature of light.
>
> David
>
This is a very small crop, hardly a representation, with no other info they
are meaningless.

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   09-10-2005 at 09:34:42 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

Why don't you check *up* one message at the pix *he's* taken??? Not too bad,
really, even for biased folks.




"Rich" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:k7j4i19bhql7gpv5tlbl4q9gr3p50rjp37@4ax.com...
>
> Seems to be a bit of noise....
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/ [...] e=14973880

Reply to Anonymous
Anonymous   09-10-2005 at 07:20:27 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

In message <MPG.1d8c2ad7d7b11e92989a2b@news.verizon.net>,
Brian Baird <no@no.thank.u> wrote:

>Of course, the D2X ended up producing cleaner images in the end - chalk
>it up to pre-production firmware, I guess.

External RAW converters usually improve over time, too, even if the
camera stays the same.
--

<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><

Reply to Anonymous
Rich   09-10-2005 at 05:40:43 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

 

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:35:27 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:

>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:03:42 -0400, Rich <none@none.com> wrote:
>
>>Seems to be a bit of noise....
>>
>>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1022&message=14973880
>
>
>Must be the plastic.

Holds in heat longer than metal = more noisy shots. :)

Reply to Rich
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital SLR > Sony R1 images....er.....
Go to:

There are 1020 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.408 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
Related Content
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them