Will the 7850 be enough for future games @1366x768?

Status
Not open for further replies.

otsoloffufgus

Honorable
Jul 2, 2012
77
0
10,630
Hey everyone, I am upgrading my graphics card and am wondering if the HD 7850 would be enough for 1366x768 res?
I am not going to upgrade my monitor.... I also want this card to last for ATLEAST one year, and i want to be able to play games at ultra settings with 60fps, I was also thinking of getting a gtx 660, but i read that if you overclock the 7850 it can be almost as good.
My specs:
Intel core i3 2100 @ 3.1 ghz
Intel integrated graphics :/
Antec VP 450w PSU
1 tb HD
Like I said, the most important thing to me is being able to play all the latest games at ultra settings with 60fps.
Should i get the HD 7850 or the gtx 660?? (the 7850 is 160$ and the 660 is 200$)
Im really confused. :(
 
Solution
I wouldnt use a Blower Style GPU in a system that doesnt have Above average cooling. Blower Fans have a habit of creating hotspots on the GPU. Kinda why most 3rd Parties use another cooling solution. NvIDIA's reference designs work, but usually 3rd party cooling is better.

If you plan on getting a 1920x1080 Monitor in the future then I would get a 2GB card. On games like crysis, BF3 and CIV V. Its not hard for me to push 1500MBs worth of textures. Also games are breaching that 1GB boundry atm so 1GB is going to become pointless in the near future.

About your Cooling. You need at least 1 Exhaust fan. Your CPU fan, Your GPU fan, And your PSU fan. Thats what I have with Higher End hardware and my temps stay in acceptable ranges with...

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160
Same. Its hard to future proof more than a year anymore. Your I3 will most likely be the next upgrae required in the future after you get your 7850.

Well, Future Proof by retaining at least High Graphics In new games
Low>Med>High>Ultra If you catch my drift

=D
 

johnsonjohnson

Honorable
Dec 15, 2012
779
0
11,160
The GTX 660 is commonly talked about at 1080p so I would say that there's no point in you getting it. The GTX 660 is probably going to last a little longer and be a little faster but remember that next gen cards are always just around the corner.
 

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160
If I remember correctly, The GTX 660 is somewhat Equal to a 7870.
Im also not "That" knowlegable on AMD cards and how they compare to NvIDIA cards. The above was what I read somewhere else.

It would be faster than your 7850 from what Ive read on various forums and benchmarking sites. Some people say that as you lower your resolution that more stress is put on your CPU. And that with a lowergrade CPU, you would eventually bottleneck yourself.

If your going to get a GTX 660 then I recommend also getting a 1920x1080 Monitor of some sort.

I use a GTX 660 and I can max out just about everything with 60FPS+ (Mind you that at such a high resoluion I only use FXAA or 2x MSAA)

As for how long it would last just depends on the manufactuer. I love Asus Cards, But ive seen some last 1 year, some last 4-5. Just depends on so many different variables
 

otsoloffufgus

Honorable
Jul 2, 2012
77
0
10,630

Ya i know its pretty low but to be honest, i dont really mind, iv used 1080p monitors before and i really dont see that much difference.
 

rocknrollz

Distinguished
Nov 16, 2011
750
0
19,010
I have the same res. never got what the hype was about with 1080p with games. Sometimes I wish I had 1080p when I video edit for more space, but for games it goes great. I think the 660 is the way to go. It will max all your games out at that res for a little while.
 

sm620

Honorable
Oct 18, 2012
196
0
10,710
I would go with NVidia just because the 660 is faster than all of AMd's cards depending on the model you get. I have a 660 ti and play at 1080p with 60 fps at max settings. NVidia also passes tons of great driver updates that will optimise your card for whatever games you play. I highly suggest NVidia over AMd, but it really depends on the model of the card in most cases because your speed varies with different brands and models. If you read that the AMd card can overclock to the 660, it might have been a specific card. If you overclock the 660 it will likely out perform the overclocked AMd. I do not recomend overclocking if you don't know what you are doing, so I suggest the 660 over the other one. If I were you I'd be concerned about bottlenecking on your CPU. the low res with a high card means you are more likely to lose performance on a lower end CPU.
 

yummerzzz

Distinguished
Mar 22, 2011
1,115
0
19,360

Disregard this post.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/548?vs=660
Go higher up and the HD 7950 destroys it, especially with the new drivers.
 

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160
7950 Does Destory Both the 660, 7850 and 7870, But it also costs more and needs more POWER! UNLIMITED POWER!!!! ... Ahem...Sorry

Still I recommend the 7850. 660,7870,7950 for 1080P



7950 - 299.99 -319.99 USD ■500W (or greater) power supply with two 75W 6-pin PCI Express power connectors recommended

660 - 219.99 -239.9 USD / 450W Minimum System Power Requirement (W) One 6-pin

7870 - 219.99 - 259.99 USD ■500W (or greater) power supply with one 75W 6-pin PCI Express power connector recommended

7850 - 189.99 (Sale 169.99) - 219.99 USD ■500W (or greater) power supply with one 75W 6-pin PCI Express power connector recommended

Taken from reference Cards. They are a little over zealous witht the PSU requirments but you get the point

Edit-

Thank you mohit9206

@sm620 (Below) I know right? My 660 is OC to 1110Mhz
 

sm620

Honorable
Oct 18, 2012
196
0
10,710
that benchmark uses a medium end 660. I will admit I hadn't looked at the 660, and I was a little disapointed to see that the clock rate wasn't as fast as I expected. a 660 card can hit 1100 MHz and the benchmark uses a 980MHz card with the 7870 the benchmark uses a 1000 MHz card and the higher AMd ones get 1100 MHz. that 20MHz can account for some of the differences and a new NVidia driver came out that optimized some high performance games. the 660 ti is a lot faster than the 660 than I thought so the 660 is not faster than all AMd cards, I was wrong on that because I hadn't looked any products up. I still think that the 660 is faster and the 660 has more proccessors in it so it will speed up anything that uses CUDA cores more.
 

sm620

Honorable
Oct 18, 2012
196
0
10,710
by the way the bottlenecking thing might affect you because of the low resolution and your proccessor. I haven't looked at i3 proccessors because I don't have time, but if you bottleneck you can pick any GPU it will lock at specific speed if your CPU can't handle it. The i3 is usually a dual core so I think you will bottleneck. I might be wrong because I am new to CPU's and I am still learning about them.
 

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160
His i3 is Hyperthreaded so that should save the OP with most games right now. (That is, as long as the program can use Hyperthreding)

If the CPU doesnt have enough speed to send the information it needs to, then your GPU can only go as fast as the CPU can send information.

7850/660 Shouldnt have this issue. Anything higher most likely will =/
 

sm620

Honorable
Oct 18, 2012
196
0
10,710
I didn't think any games utilized HT Technology. I heard that from someone on a diferent thread when I was asking about CPU's and gaming. either way both cards should play on maximum settings and get above 30 fps especially with the monitor. I would get the card that is supposed to last the longest.
 

simmons33

Honorable
Nov 7, 2012
699
0
11,160
Only one I know of is BF3. Havnt fully researched it yet =D

Still, Being a NvIDIA fanboy I would automatic recommend the 660. But thats a bit overkill for 1366/768 ( 1,049.088)

Most all 660s are used at 1920/1080 (2,073,600)

7850s Cheaper and is a perfect fit IMO for 1366/768 =D

And I mean, Just the difference from going Intel HD Graphics to a Mid Range GPU is just scary
 

otsoloffufgus

Honorable
Jul 2, 2012
77
0
10,630

That card does look nice but its quite a bit more expensive :/ I found a 7850 for 160$
 
Status
Not open for further replies.