The toughest image issue for DSLRs and all digitals

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

IMO, it's when a finely-detailed object is surrounded or bordered by
a very bright area. The inevitable pixel-bleed happens, causing the
edges of the object to erode. This can be most easily seen when a
tree branch with vaninshingly small details is silhouetted against a
bright sky. I'm wondering which camera is best at dealing with this,
and does pixel size play any part in it? I know that some CCDs/CMOS
exhibit a deeper "well" capacity to deal with what might become excess
charges, but I don't know how each camera handles this.
-Rich

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

Darrell <spam@this.eh> wrote:

> "Rich" <none@none.com> wrote in message
> news:5t4kj1hv6ipgbal6vtsbh3atr9r2a51lat@4ax.com...
> > IMO, it's when a finely-detailed object is surrounded or bordered by
> > a very bright area. The inevitable pixel-bleed happens, causing the
> > edges of the object to erode. This can be most easily seen when a
> > tree branch with vaninshingly small details is silhouetted against a
> > bright sky. I'm wondering which camera is best at dealing with this,
> > and does pixel size play any part in it? I know that some CCDs/CMOS
> > exhibit a deeper "well" capacity to deal with what might become excess
> > charges, but I don't know how each camera handles this.
> >
> Film also has a hard time with a similar scene.

as do human eyes to a degree as well.

Roger

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:52:27 +0100, "Gormless" <simeon@gormless.com>
wrote:

>
>"Rich" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>news:5t4kj1hv6ipgbal6vtsbh3atr9r2a51lat@4ax.com...
>> IMO,
>
>Who asked for it?
>
>

Obviously you did since you read the post. Don't
you reactionaries ever ask yourself WHY you keep
reading posts you claim to dislike?
-Rich