Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)
Anybody have any experience with this camera? I bought one a week ago, took
a few pix, and then the camera stopped focusing. I returned it to the store
and they were very nice about it as they replaced the camera, but I'm now a
bit concerned about reliability.
I like the camera. Good 12:1 optical zoom, nifty anti-shake, easy-to-handle
size, etc. But I don't want to be in the middle of nowhere with failed
electronics.
Also makes me glad I bought it from a local store instead of on-line. That's
pretty unusual for me.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)
Bob Patton wrote:
> Anybody have any experience with this camera? I bought one a week
> ago, took a few pix, and then the camera stopped focusing. I returned
> it to the store and they were very nice about it as they replaced the
> camera, but I'm now a bit concerned about reliability.
>
> I like the camera. Good 12:1 optical zoom, nifty anti-shake,
> easy-to-handle size, etc. But I don't want to be in the middle of
> nowhere with failed electronics.
>
> Also makes me glad I bought it from a local store instead of on-line.
> That's pretty unusual for me.
I went for the Panasonic FZ20 - it got a slightly better write-up and
keeps the f/2.8 at the long end of the aperture range. Single cell
battery rather than fumble-in-the-field AAs, but I know that people differ
in their preferences! I did have a Minolta A2 but I sent it back because
of image quality and ruggedness concerns.
Can't comment on reliability as yet, though. Come back in six months.
<G>
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)
"Bob Patton" <rwpmailatcharterdotnet> wrote in message
news:10oq87c4h725g89@corp.supernews.com...
> Anybody have any experience with this camera? I bought one a week ago,
> took a few pix, and then the camera stopped focusing. I returned it to the
> store and they were very nice about it as they replaced the camera, but
> I'm now a bit concerned about reliability.
>
> I like the camera. Good 12:1 optical zoom, nifty anti-shake,
> easy-to-handle size, etc. But I don't want to be in the middle of nowhere
> with failed electronics.
>
> Also makes me glad I bought it from a local store instead of on-line.
> That's pretty unusual for me.
Make sure you update the cam's firmware to the latest version..
I'm VERY pleased with mine, but have only had it a few weeks now. I did drop
mine about a foot, and it rolled another foot, and there wasn't a scratch,
or problem with it at all.. VERY surprising.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)
"David J Taylor" <david-taylor@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:2v4n7kF2gtk9qU1@uni-berlin.de...
//snip//
> I went for the Panasonic FZ20 - it got a slightly better write-up and
> keeps the f/2.8 at the long end of the aperture range. Single cell
> battery rather than fumble-in-the-field AAs, but I know that people differ
> in their preferences! I did have a Minolta A2 but I sent it back because
> of image quality and ruggedness concerns.
>
> Can't comment on reliability as yet, though. Come back in six months. <G>
>
The FZ20's a fine camera - but the z3 just fit my hand a little better. I
also have a Dimage X that's served well as my first digicam, and I guess I'm
just inclined towards Minolta since I owned my first srT-101 almost thirty
years ago.
Bob
Firmware is version 1.02, which is the current version. I'll take a look at
the forums, too.
So far, I'm really impressed with the camera. I love my old Minolta srT-101
and its lenses, but this is a superb replacement. Thanks for the info!
Bob
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.