Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)
"Deputy Dog" <dave@sibbett(removethis).com> wrote in message news:42mAd.13672$152.6824@trndny01...
> a ZLR camera? What sets it apart fom all the rest?
There are, at this time, but a handful of high power zoom cameras on the market that are not
of the dSLR variety. The Canon 1S IS, the Panasonic DMC FZs etc. It is these cameras that
are considered ZLRs. Kind of a midway high performance camera between the regular digital
P&S cameras and the much more expensive dSLR cameras.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)
Deputy Dog <dave@sibbett(removethis).com> wrote:
> a ZLR camera? What sets it apart fom all the rest?
>
The lens.
The working definition most people here seem to use is a high(ish)-end
compact digital camera with a fixed lens capable of long zoom - there's
no "hard and fast" definition of what is and isn't ZLR but most of the
cameras people discuss here have lenses that go out to the equivalent
of anywhere between 280 and 420mm on a 35mm SLR.
ZLRs tend to be made by companies who know what they're doing optically;
Nikon, Canon and Konica-Minolta make excellent lenses anyway; Panasonic
use Leica lenses on their Lumix ZLR range, and Sony use Zeiss.
I think most of us who own ZLRs do so out of a mixture of convenience
and budget - certainly I recognise the superiority of dSLRs, but
a lot of my photography (particularly motorsport and railways) is done at
long zoom, and a dSLR and suitable lens would be bulky and prohibitively
expensive....
pete
--
pete@fenelon.com "there's no room for enigmas in built-up areas"
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.