Tom's Hardware > Forum > Mobility Brands > Nokia > Mpixel Nokia 6230??

Mpixel Nokia 6230??

Forum Mobility Brands : Nokia - Mpixel Nokia 6230??

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

Just as a point of interest, I wonder if any of you chaps know what the Mega
pixel resolution is, of the Nokia 6230??

(and before you mention, it's NITFM!) :-)

Where as Nokia 6230i (and many others) are 1.30 Mpixel, what is the 6230
0.XX Mpixel.

Thanks to anyone knowlegable.

Cheers

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

> Just as a point of interest, I wonder if any of you chaps know what the
> Mega
> pixel resolution is, of the Nokia 6230??
>
> (and before you mention, it's NITFM!) :-)
>
> Where as Nokia 6230i (and many others) are 1.30 Mpixel, what is the 6230
> 0.XX Mpixel.
>
> Thanks to anyone knowlegable.
>
> Cheers

http://www.nokia.co.uk/nokia/0,8764,72156,00.html

I think 640 x 480 relates to roughtly 0.3 MP

HTH

Chris

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

Thanks for that Chris.
How dumb of me :-(
Didn't realize that was the equation

640 x 480 = 307,200 pixels (.3)
v
1280 x 1024 = 1,310,720 pixels (1.3)

Cheers




"Chris Jeffries" <chris@NOSPAMchrisjeffries.net> wrote in message
news:d6pnom$ss5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Just as a point of interest, I wonder if any of you chaps know what the
> > Mega
> > pixel resolution is, of the Nokia 6230??
> >
> > (and before you mention, it's NITFM!) :-)
> >
> > Where as Nokia 6230i (and many others) are 1.30 Mpixel, what is the 6230
> > 0.XX Mpixel.
> >
> > Thanks to anyone knowlegable.
> >
> > Cheers
>
> http://www.nokia.co.uk/nokia/0,8764,72156,00.html
>
> I think 640 x 480 relates to roughtly 0.3 MP
>
> HTH
>
> Chris
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

"Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
news:d6pofe$bdd$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Thanks for that Chris.
> How dumb of me :-(
> Didn't realize that was the equation
>
> 640 x 480 = 307,200 pixels (.3)
> v
> 1280 x 1024 = 1,310,720 pixels (1.3)
>
> Cheers
>

Don't be too hard on yourself :-)

I'd bet a pound to a penny that probably 99.9% of teenagers happily videoing
their private parts wouldn't have known it either.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

"Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
news:d6pmsd$ss2$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Just as a point of interest, I wonder if any of you chaps know what the
> Mega
> pixel resolution is, of the Nokia 6230??
>
> (and before you mention, it's NITFM!) :-)
>
> Where as Nokia 6230i (and many others) are 1.30 Mpixel, what is the 6230
> 0.XX Mpixel.

Keep in mind that it's not just the megapixels that make a camera, as i'm
sure you maybe know already(?)...

The samsung d500 is 1.3 megapixels, it's not the best photos ever. BUT this
applies to any phone currently, so if you're looking for a digital camera
replacement you'll be waiting a good 1 to 2 years still!

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

But regrettably I am not a teenager.

With regard to videoing my private parts!! :-) (Only joking)

;-)


"Nick Cleevely" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:g3%je.4672$iq5.2693@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
> news:d6pofe$bdd$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Thanks for that Chris.
> > How dumb of me :-(
> > Didn't realize that was the equation
> >
> > 640 x 480 = 307,200 pixels (.3)
> > v
> > 1280 x 1024 = 1,310,720 pixels (1.3)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
>
> Don't be too hard on yourself :-)
>
> I'd bet a pound to a penny that probably 99.9% of teenagers happily
videoing
> their private parts wouldn't have known it either.
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

No not at all.

The 6230 I have at the moment DOES return good quality pictures, but I just
wondered (ball park) what the difference is likely to be, "ish", as I intend
upgrading to the 6230i.

Currently I run a 35mm Minolta 700si, and the Cannon 350d (6Mpix), but I am
unable to make calls on either of those cameras!! :-)

Cheers




"Yozzi" <yozziNAESPAMWANTED@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:tK%je.13287$yY4.3369@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
> "Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
> news:d6pmsd$ss2$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Just as a point of interest, I wonder if any of you chaps know what the
> > Mega
> > pixel resolution is, of the Nokia 6230??
> >
> > (and before you mention, it's NITFM!) :-)
> >
> > Where as Nokia 6230i (and many others) are 1.30 Mpixel, what is the 6230
> > 0.XX Mpixel.
>
> Keep in mind that it's not just the megapixels that make a camera, as i'm
> sure you maybe know already(?)...
>
> The samsung d500 is 1.3 megapixels, it's not the best photos ever. BUT
this
> applies to any phone currently, so if you're looking for a digital camera
> replacement you'll be waiting a good 1 to 2 years still!
>
>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

>
> I'd bet a pound to a penny that probably 99.9% of teenagers happily
> videoing their private parts wouldn't have known it either.
Im not a teenager...............

Steve

Reply to steve

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

"Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
news:d6qe4a$eji$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> No not at all.
>
> The 6230 I have at the moment DOES return good quality pictures, but I
> just
> wondered (ball park) what the difference is likely to be, "ish", as I
> intend
> upgrading to the 6230i.
>
> Currently I run a 35mm Minolta 700si, and the Cannon 350d (6Mpix), but I
> am
> unable to make calls on either of those cameras!! :-)

No no, there's firmware ugprades available for canons to allow basic calling
features. No sms as of yet though :-(

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

Yozzi,

I'm aware of the upgrade, but that is only available for the Canon cameras
made in Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Owing to the fact that I can speak neither of
those languages, I still need to carry my phone :-))

Thanks anyway

;-)






"Yozzi" <yozziNAESPAMWANTED@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:Im5ke.15064$sE4.976@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...
> "Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
> news:d6qe4a$eji$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > No not at all.
> >
> > The 6230 I have at the moment DOES return good quality pictures, but I
> > just
> > wondered (ball park) what the difference is likely to be, "ish", as I
> > intend
> > upgrading to the 6230i.
> >
> > Currently I run a 35mm Minolta 700si, and the Cannon 350d (6Mpix), but I
> > am
> > unable to make calls on either of those cameras!! :-)
>
> No no, there's firmware ugprades available for canons to allow basic
calling
> features. No sms as of yet though :-(
>
>

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net declared for all the world to hear...
> Just as a point of interest, I wonder if any of you chaps know what the Mega
> pixel resolution is, of the Nokia 6230??

0.3 or thereabouts.
--
Regards
Jon

Reply to Jon

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

"Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
news:d6r2l0$us5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Yozzi,
>
> I'm aware of the upgrade, but that is only available for the Canon cameras
> made in Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Owing to the fact that I can speak neither
> of
> those languages, I still need to carry my phone :-))
>
> Thanks anyway
>
> ;-)

That's what i get for making it up....boooo confused yozzi...

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.nokia.ringtones (More info?)

 

:-)

:-)


"Yozzi" <yozziNAESPAMWANTED@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:Drjke.14037$V%.1749@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
> "Kevin I Chapple" <kevinx@NOTTHISBITearthling.net> wrote in message
> news:d6r2l0$us5$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Yozzi,
> >
> > I'm aware of the upgrade, but that is only available for the Canon
cameras
> > made in Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Owing to the fact that I can speak
neither
> > of
> > those languages, I still need to carry my phone :-))
> >
> > Thanks anyway
> >
> > ;-)
>
> That's what i get for making it up....boooo confused yozzi...
>
>

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Mobility Brands > Nokia > Mpixel Nokia 6230??
Go to:

There are 1193 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them