Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)

 

Just recieved an Fujifilm S5500, and wondered if A: this is the right group
to ask this question and B: Ive noticed that the pictures seem to be quite a
bit blurrier than my previous, supposedly inferior S301. Anybody else come
across this?
Cheers
Stuart

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)

 

stuart wrote:
> Just recieved an Fujifilm S5500, and wondered if A: this is the right
> group to ask this question and B: Ive noticed that the pictures seem
> to be quite a bit blurrier than my previous, supposedly inferior
> S301. Anybody else come across this?
> Cheers
> Stuart

A - for consideration in this group, broadly cameras should look like an
SLR, not have interchangeable lenses, and have full manual control of
aperture, shutter speed, and focus. I suspect you camera broadly meets
these criteria.

David

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)

 

"stuart" <member@smeigh.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dff6e3$amc$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Just recieved an Fujifilm S5500, and wondered if A: this is the right
group
> to ask this question and B: Ive noticed that the pictures seem to be quite
a
> bit blurrier than my previous, supposedly inferior S301. Anybody else
come
> across this?

Haven't noticed myself. I got an S5500 a few months ago and am delighted
with it. I moved from a three year old low spec digital compact, so couldn't
comment on the difference between that and the S301. Have you tried setting
the sharpness to hard?

John

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)

 

"John Bailey" <koihoh@ihoih.com> wrote in message
news:dffffq$5eu$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> "stuart" <member@smeigh.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dff6e3$amc$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
>> Just recieved an Fujifilm S5500, and wondered if A: this is the right
> group
>> to ask this question and B: Ive noticed that the pictures seem to be
>> quite
> a
>> bit blurrier than my previous, supposedly inferior S301. Anybody else
> come
>> across this?
>
> Haven't noticed myself. I got an S5500 a few months ago and am delighted
> with it. I moved from a three year old low spec digital compact, so
> couldn't
> comment on the difference between that and the S301. Have you tried
> setting
> the sharpness to hard?
>
> John
>
Thanks for the input - no, I havnt yet. I am basically pleased with the
camera, esp outside shots, but just surprised that I have to take a lot of
inside shots to make sure I get a couple of good ones.
stuart

Reply to stuart

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)

 

stuart wrote:
[]
> Thanks for the input - no, I havnt yet. I am basically pleased with
> the camera, esp outside shots, but just surprised that I have to take
> a lot of inside shots to make sure I get a couple of good ones.
> stuart

Any chance you are getting camera shake? A rule of thumb is that the
shutter should be faster than 1/focal-length, so with the maximum 370mm
focal length you would need a shutter speed faster than 1/370s, i.e.
1/500s or 1/1000s. Indoors this might need a lot of light, or use a
tripod. Even at the widest angle (37mm), you want shutter speeds of 1/50s
or faster.

(The reason I love image stabilisation is that it multiplies these times
by about 10, so a 370mm lens only needs a shutter speed of 1/37s. Makes
the camera more adaptable to lower light conditions).

David

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.zlr (More info?)

 

"stuart" <member@smeigh.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dff6e3$amc$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Just recieved an Fujifilm S5500, and wondered if A: this is the right
> group to ask this question and B: Ive noticed that the pictures seem to be
> quite a bit blurrier than my previous, supposedly inferior S301. Anybody
> else come across this?
> Cheers
> Stuart
I have just sold the following kit because I had become disillusioned with
the sharpness of digital files over film.

Canon EOS 10D, Canon EOS 20D Canon 28 to 135 IS, Canon 70 to 300 IS and a
Canon 17 to40 L

Just so that I had something I got a S5500 and have been totally impressed
with the quality of the pictures taken, both sharpness and exposure are far
better than what I had got with either Canon body.

Reply to Paul
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Digital Camera > Digital ZLR > S5500
Go to:

There are 1331 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them