Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Crysis 3

Tags:
  • New Build
  • Crysis
  • Systems
Last response: in Systems
Share
February 23, 2013 12:33:56 PM

Hello,
hey guys ..
im running
990fx sabertooth
8350 4.2 ghz 8 core
1866 gskill ripjaws 32 gb
samsung SSD drive 500gb .. random read 100000 write 96000
2 GTX 690's SLI

i should be good for ultra res >> options.. ?

More about : crysis

February 23, 2013 1:55:26 PM

*facepalm**sigh*
m
0
l
February 23, 2013 3:14:11 PM

-swap that CPU for a i5-3570K
-RAM is overkill, get 2x4GB 1600MHz of RAM
-2x GTX690 SLI?really? why don't just get a GTX Titan or 2x 7970GHz edition CFX
-what is your PSU?
m
0
l
Related resources
February 23, 2013 4:17:24 PM

actually the FX 8350 is the best CPU for Crysis 3 as the game loves cores, it outperforms all Intel CPU except for the 3930k and above!
m
0
l
February 24, 2013 6:38:12 PM

redeemer said:
actually the FX 8350 is the best CPU for Crysis 3 as the game loves cores, it outperforms all Intel CPU except for the 3930k and above!


Can you link a benchmark showing this?
m
0
l
February 25, 2013 12:43:53 AM

ZombifiedPyro said:
Can you link a benchmark showing this?

i don't think so... Intel's CPU still beats the FX-8350 in both perfomance and power consumption...
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/11/06/amd-fx-8350...
FX-8350 is also a beast that is hungry for power... so you will have to pay more for your electricity if you get it... :sweat: 
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/11/06/amd-fx-8350...
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2012/11/06/amd-fx-8350...
m
0
l
February 25, 2013 1:00:29 AM

The OP doesn't seem to be building... rather.. seems like he was linking his current build and asking if it would run crysis.
m
0
l
February 25, 2013 1:17:24 AM

eyeage said:
The OP doesn't seem to be building... rather.. seems like he was linking his current build and asking if it would run crysis.

is it? if that's what he is trying to ask then of course it will run Crysis 3 fine but that's a lot of money spend on unnecessary parts... :sweat:  :sweat:  :sweat: 
m
0
l
February 25, 2013 2:54:53 AM

SLI 690 seems trollish to me... honestly... but you never can tell
m
0
l
February 25, 2013 3:06:01 AM

eyeage said:
SLI 690 seems trollish to me... honestly... but you never can tell

LOL i agree with you ... SLI GTX 690 basically = 4-way SLI GTX 680 TBH... i'd rather go for a SLI GTX 670 and upgrade to newer series of GPU in the future... :sweat: 
m
0
l
February 25, 2013 12:59:56 PM

TimeLass said:
LOL i agree with you ... SLI GTX 690 basically = 4-way SLI GTX 680 TBH... i'd rather go for a SLI GTX 670 and upgrade to newer series of GPU in the future... :sweat: 


I'm just going to SLI GTX 660 TIs for now. I'll buy them one at a time. Why get something that's completely unnecessary right now when I won't be needing it? Also, if you're going to SLI GTX 690s then why not just build a new PC for that amount of money? 2k USD is enough to build a good gaming PC that can play Crysis 3.
m
0
l
March 9, 2013 7:54:17 PM

Well thanks everyone for your imput... I actually am preparing for doom 4. And the next gen.. of games.. 2 gtx 690. Is not an ovrkill .. money is not important.. at this time.. as it goes for the chip war .. intel is good for raw calcullations amd good for games... why do you think next gen consoles will have fx chips amd... not intel .....thanks again for your respones.
m
0
l
!