I don;t know what I'm doing here - so asking the experts.
I have a very old reel to reel tape recorder with twin cable output
joined to a circular 5-pin connector (XLR?). I need to connect to an
RCA type input. Can I just cut off the old connector and replace with
2 RCA jacks, or if not - what to do?
"atticus" wrote ...
> I don;t know what I'm doing here - so asking the experts.
>
> I have a very old reel to reel tape recorder with twin cable output
> joined to a circular 5-pin connector (XLR?). I need to connect to an
> RCA type input. Can I just cut off the old connector and replace with
> 2 RCA jacks, or if not - what to do?
European equipment of a certain vintage used 5-pin DIN
connectors for line in and out. Adapter cables (with RCA
at the other end) are available. For example...
http://store.a2zcable.com/audio-au [...] --rca.html
> I have a very old reel to reel tape recorder with twin cable output
> joined to a circular 5-pin connector (XLR?). I need to connect to an
> RCA type input. Can I just cut off the old connector and replace with
> 2 RCA jacks, or if not - what to do?
On 4 Jun 2004 01:57:51 -0700, google@maxihost.com (atticus) wrote:
>I don;t know what I'm doing here - so asking the experts.
>
>I have a very old reel to reel tape recorder with twin cable output
>joined to a circular 5-pin connector (XLR?). I need to connect to an
>RCA type input. Can I just cut off the old connector and replace with
>2 RCA jacks, or if not - what to do?
>
>Thanks in advance for your help.
Doubtless a DIN connector. The electrical characteristics were
actually different to the Line In and Line Out normally found on RCA
connections. But today's amplifiers are very forgiving. Try a
direct connection as you suggest.
Pin 3 (top) is common ground. The remaining 4 pins may be a
combination of inputs and outputs. Here in the UK a 5-DIN to 4-phono
cable is easily obtainable. Maybe also wherever you are?
If your tape recorder has two DIN ports, I'd expect one to be in/out
to amplifier, the other to be a microphone input.
> The electrical characteristics were
>actually different to the Line In and Line Out normally found on RCA
>connections.
How so?
--
========================================================================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
mkesti@gv.net | - The Who, Bargain
"Michael R. Kesti" <mkesti@gv.net> wrote in message
news:40C254C0.56C15E68@gv.net...
> Laurence Payne wrote:
>
> >Doubtless a DIN connector.
>
> I agree.
>
> > The electrical characteristics were
> >actually different to the Line In and Line Out normally found on RCA
> >connections.
>
> How so?
IIRC, they had significantly higher output impedance, and
lower input impedance than modern consumer line-level.
They may also have had a different definition of "line-level".
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.