Archived from groups: rec.audio.tech (
More info?)
Randyman wrote:
> Thank you for the answers Marc and Peter! I was wondering how long the
> cables for the microphones should be for one of these small recorders?
Balanced mic cables can be very long.
> Should the mic have its own power? Would a portable preamp for the
> microphones be necessary ....
Here are the FR2 specs off of the fostex website:
[quote from fostex's website begin]
Recording industry standard, PC-compatible BWF files (stereo/mono) on a
FAT32 media format
Up to 24-bit/192kHz uncompressed recording
Includes a unique 22.05kHz sampling frequency setting for extended
recording
Records to both Type II CompactFlash™ cards and PCMCIA 1.8” hard disk
drives*1
Fostex’s “File per Take” system with auto scene & take naming/increment
Two balanced XLR microphone inputs with switchable phantom power and top
quality, high headroom mic pre-amps
132 x 64 dot matrix LCD screen for ease of use & high visibility in the
field
Uses AA-sized rechargeable NiMH batteries which are widely available due
to the popularity of digital cameras. 8 AA cells will provide
approximately 2.5 hours operation when recording to a CF card
Easy file transfer to PC/Mac via PCMCIA, CF adaptor or standard on-board
USB connection for data editing and/or backup*2
Quick and easy on-board file naming or via external keyboard through
standard USB keyboard port
“Pre-record” loop buffer of approximately 10 seconds*3
Easy software update via CF or PCMCIA card with downloads from the
internet
Optional timecode generator / reader card
[quote from fostex's website end]
> for collecting ambient environmental sounds (trains, traffic,
> planes, crowds, street noises, birds, night sounds, etc),
Quite many of these sounds are available in sound libraries for the
movie industry.
> and would the cost be almost as much or more than the recorder?
You seem to ask about something that somebody told you.
> Would I want a long shotgun to point at a particular noise source?
You will get better sound by going closer with an omni.
> Would a dynamic type mic be best for what I want?
I don't know whether Sennheiser still makes the MD211, but it could be a
good choice. Mono is sometimes not a bad idea, but of course, if you
need it for a stereo scenery it should be just that: stereo. Something
like the Audio Technica AT825 might be useful for you. A pair of
Sennheiser Evolution E664's are another option. If you can tolerate a
probable treble oddity of some kind (peak around 10 kHz probably) then a
product like ADK SC1 twinpack might be "just it", and the price is
certainly right for something to learn sound recording with.
> I want to start collecting my own sounds for
> future video editing.
OK, let us assume that you find the perfect steam calliope to record,
surely having pictures too would make sense, such are not easy to find
on the day you need them. Allow me to humbly suggest wearing hearing
protection near such a contraption btw ....
> Am I silly to wait until later this fall to see if Sony comes
> out with an HD proconsumer camcorder? Any rumors on Sony or
> Canon coming out with one later this year? Other wise I
> should just buy the DCR-VX2100 and get going on video.
Insufficient knowhow, so: no comments other than: it is probably not
cost efficient for you to get a dedicated sound recording apparatus. No
matter what, perhaps you should start with a good book about sound
recording first.
> Sincerely --Randyman
Kind regards
Peter Larsen
--
*******************************************
* My site is at:
http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
*******************************************