this old deck has a 5 pin DIN socket on the back. Input is switchable
on the front panel -either 'line '(rear phono sockets) or 'MIC/din'
(jack plugs on front of decks and the aforementioned rear DIN)
When i tried to connect a second cassette deck to it (going into the
Technics) for copying, there was gross distortion caused by signal
overload. I suspect that the deck is running at MIC level whenn in
position MIC/DIN and line level in 'phono'position.
I want to make use of the DIN socket for line-level input signal.
What rating of attenuator resistor should I use? just thought I would
post here before experimenting in case anyone has done a similar
conversion
On 29 Jun 2004 06:24:10 -0700, reverend_rogers@yahoo.com (b) wrote:
>this old deck has a 5 pin DIN socket on the back. Input is switchable
>on the front panel -either 'line '(rear phono sockets) or 'MIC/din'
>(jack plugs on front of decks and the aforementioned rear DIN)
>
> When i tried to connect a second cassette deck to it (going into the
>Technics) for copying, there was gross distortion caused by signal
>overload. I suspect that the deck is running at MIC level whenn in
>position MIC/DIN and line level in 'phono'position.
>
> I want to make use of the DIN socket for line-level input signal.
>What rating of attenuator resistor should I use? just thought I would
>post here before experimenting in case anyone has done a similar
>conversion
>
>Thanks, Ben
On 29 Jun 2004 06:24:10 -0700, reverend_rogers@yahoo.com (b) wrote:
>this old deck has a 5 pin DIN socket on the back. Input is switchable
>on the front panel -either 'line '(rear phono sockets) or 'MIC/din'
>(jack plugs on front of decks and the aforementioned rear DIN)
>
> When i tried to connect a second cassette deck to it (going into the
>Technics) for copying, there was gross distortion caused by signal
>overload. I suspect that the deck is running at MIC level whenn in
>position MIC/DIN and line level in 'phono'position.
>
> I want to make use of the DIN socket for line-level input signal.
>What rating of attenuator resistor should I use? just thought I would
>post here before experimenting in case anyone has done a similar
>conversion
I think there's an impedance difference as well as a level one. Best
results may be from using the phono ports, even if it does involve
some re-plugging.
Laurence, thanks for your input (pardon the pun!)
I have read elsewhere that it may be necessary to insert , say, a 100K
resistor in series and add a 1K to ground. (line to mic level)
However, I wonder,since the deck is stereo would I compromise that by
effectively linking both L and R channels to ground?
Laurence Payne <l@laurenceDELETEpayne.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message (snip)>
> I think there's an impedance difference as well as a level one. Best
> results may be from using the phono ports, even if it does involve
> some re-plugging.
I know I can use the phonos; What i had in mind was basically avoiding
replugging .The amp only has one cass input so i wanted to connect the
technics to the amp with phonos (L R in/out) and connect a 2nd
playback cass deck to Technics' DIN socket, bypassing the amp
altogether. Just an idea.....
Ben
I just put a couple of 120 ohm resistors between signal and grounds
and that produced an acceptable result.
I also downloaded the owner's manual from here:
reverend_rogers@yahoo.com (b) wrote in message news:<1cfa6663.0406291627.3f370028@posting.google.com>...
> Laurence, thanks for your input (pardon the pun!)
> I have read elsewhere that it may be necessary to insert , say, a 100K
> resistor in series and add a 1K to ground. (line to mic level)
> However, I wonder,since the deck is stereo would I compromise that by
> effectively linking both L and R channels to ground?
>
> Laurence Payne <l@laurenceDELETEpayne.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message (snip)>
> > I think there's an impedance difference as well as a level one. Best
> > results may be from using the phono ports, even if it does involve
> > some re-plugging.
>
> I know I can use the phonos; What i had in mind was basically avoiding
> replugging .The amp only has one cass input so i wanted to connect the
> technics to the amp with phonos (L R in/out) and connect a 2nd
> playback cass deck to Technics' DIN socket, bypassing the amp
> altogether. Just an idea.....
> Ben
On 29 Jun 2004 17:27:10 -0700, reverend_rogers@yahoo.com (b) wrote:
>Laurence, thanks for your input (pardon the pun!)
>I have read elsewhere that it may be necessary to insert , say, a 100K
>resistor in series and add a 1K to ground. (line to mic level)
>However, I wonder,since the deck is stereo would I compromise that by
>effectively linking both L and R channels to ground?
That sort of circuit is the basis of many inputs on all sorts of
equipment. Crosstalk isn't a problem.
>
>Laurence Payne <l@laurenceDELETEpayne.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message (snip)>
>> I think there's an impedance difference as well as a level one. Best
>> results may be from using the phono ports, even if it does involve
>> some re-plugging.
>
>I know I can use the phonos; What i had in mind was basically avoiding
>replugging .The amp only has one cass input so i wanted to connect the
>technics to the amp with phonos (L R in/out) and connect a 2nd
>playback cass deck to Technics' DIN socket, bypassing the amp
>altogether. Just an idea.....
Has the amp a spare Aux In, CD In or Tuner In? They are identical to
a Tape In.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.