Sign-in / Sign-up
Your question
Closed

Video Editing and Encoding - 680Gtx Sli vs single card & Quick Sync

Tags:
  • Nvidia
  • Quick Sync
  • Video Editing
  • Encoding
  • Graphics
Last response: in Graphics Cards
January 28, 2013 1:59:32 PM

Greetings! :hello: 

What do you guys think is better for Video Editing/encoding?

Single 2gb 680 GTX with Quick Sync enabled or 2 680s Sli

I use Power Director 11 (I think CyberLink was going to take advantage of NVENC on PowerDirector 11, but I'm not sure if it's working yet)

I also read that Quick Sync + Single card might be faster, but less quality than 2 sli cards?

I use my Pc for gaming too and my system specs are I7 3770k, 16gb Ram, SSD Samsung 830 512gb and a 3tb barracuda.


Any advice would be really appreciated,

thank you. :) 

More about : video editing encoding 680gtx sli single card quick sync

Best solution

January 28, 2013 2:01:06 PM

quicksync, by far. not only is the quality better but it is considerably faster.

quicksync is by far, the best way to encode using hardware acceleration
Share
January 28, 2013 4:11:53 PM

Thank you for answering so fast, how faster is Quicksync?

I am wondering if it is like 60% faster as advertised?
Score
0
Related resources
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
January 28, 2013 4:42:15 PM

Ok thanks a lot!
Score
0
January 28, 2013 4:42:54 PM

Best answer selected by melodymoony.
Score
0