>They seem to have vanished off the face of the earth. BC 559C suitabale
>replacement ?
The BC 212, 213, 214 family of PNP transistors have been replaced by more
recent ones, the 559, 560 family being one of them. All types have an
additional letter appended which denotes the collector/base ratio.
This letter specifies about the same range at BC213 and BC 559.
BC 214 is the low noise version of the BC 213.
The main difference between the 559 and the 560 is the maximum Collector-
Emitter voltage. BC559 has a minimum Collector–Emitter Breakdown Voltage
of -30V (as does the BC 213/214) while the minimum of BC560 is -45V.
Noise seems no longer to be critical so there is no special low noise type.
Norbert Hahn wrote:
> "Geoff Wood" <geoff@paf.co.nz-nospam> wrote:
>
>> They seem to have vanished off the face of the earth. BC 559C
>> suitabale replacement ?
>
> The BC 212, 213, 214 family of PNP transistors have been replaced by
> more recent ones, the 559, 560 family being one of them. All types
> have an additional letter appended which denotes the collector/base
> ratio.
> This letter specifies about the same range at BC213 and BC 559.
> BC 214 is the low noise version of the BC 213.
>
> The main difference between the 559 and the 560 is the maximum
> Collector- Emitter voltage. BC559 has a minimum Collector-Emitter
> Breakdown Voltage of -30V (as does the BC 213/214) while the minimum
> of BC560 is -45V.
> Noise seems no longer to be critical so there is no special low noise
> type.
>
> HTH
> Norbert
Used a BC559C which seems fine. Originals were dinky little Ferranti
ZTX-214C (for Quad 405). I still have some of the little ZTX-304 and 504s !
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.