Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

How does the 660Ti compare with the 660 (GK106)

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share

I just upgraded from a 9800GTX+ to a Geforce 660 (GK106)


The thing is, I keep seeing a lot about the 660Ti. How it has 400 more shader cores and more texture units. I mean, you figure this should be a big deal, especially since I got my 660 for $100 less than the Ti. But I don't see many benchmarks that really show $100 worth of performance over my card. In some cases, it BEATS the Ti. I mean, there are higher clock speeds, sure. But it seems like there's some big catch. Like there will be some new release or driver patch that shoots the Ti way ahead.


I know I speak in hindsight, here, but would it have been worth it to shell out for a 660Ti? Or would that have been a waste of money?
Graphics card Expert

nVidia GPU naming can be confusing. But yes, you have a GK106 part(as is the 650 Ti), but the 660 Ti is different. It's a GK104, like the GTX 680 and 670; but with even more of the board disabled(some say broken) than the 670(which itself prob wasn't a good enough yeild to be a 680).

Anyway the 660 Ti is still rated ~20 percent more powerful(graphically) than a 660. But uses only 10 more watts(~7%). 150 watts vs. 140 watts.

also:
GK 106 = 2.5 billion transistors
GK 104 = 3.5 billion transistors
GK 110(Titan) = 7.1 billion transistors

and then there is core clock speed(s), memory speed, memory bandwidth, ect...

Guru3d and this site are probably my two most visited websites. Love those guys!


From what I've seen, though, the 660 has higher bandwidth and a higher clock speed, which, for the most part, compensates for many of the 660's shortcomings.

Either way, I'm not sure if the difference I'm seeing is a $100 difference. eh?
Related ressources
!