TItan benchmarks are out.

master_chen

Honorable
Jun 20, 2012
1,215
0
11,360
05e9c104f0fc2e89433b88962975ca8c.jpg


I just jizzed rainbow in mah trunks...
 

master_chen

Honorable
Jun 20, 2012
1,215
0
11,360


Three monitors. That's "20 more FPS" at three-monitor setup on maximum settings. And it's 3-way, not Quad.
For three-monitor setups "20 more FPS" is actually A LOT, since FPS falls drastically with each new monitor added.
Of course, that still doesn't justify the pricing of this GPU, but a setup of two Titans would cost less than a setup of two best 690s (EVGA's HCS), which, in my opinion, is better.
That's still a lot of money, but I can see what Nvidia tries to do there with releasing this.
 

EzioAs

Distinguished


No...and why would you feel offended? I was simply stating that the performance doesn't look as good as I expect it to be based on the last graph, where they compare the Titan, GTX680 and HD7970 GHz. Then again, we need more reviews and from a more trustful reviewer at that.
 


I was going by the 19201080 benchmarks, which shows it's roughly 25% faster in say BF3 (75% compared to 100%), and if a 7970 gets ~80FPS at Ultra quality/max af/1080p resolution, then 25% faster of that would be roughly 20FPS.

Either way, anything new is always more and it seems maybe Nvidia is focusing more on the multimonitor setups and better SLI with this new card since that area is taking off, but still it's only a niche market at best. Maybe this will trickle down to something better for the average user and more consumer level. Have to see.
 

master_chen

Honorable
Jun 20, 2012
1,215
0
11,360

Man, you really try to see angry in everything, don't you?
I was just making a comment, I wasn't bashing on you or anything. I was just wondering what's a "worthwhile performance increase" for you for it to be "good enough".
And I always call BF3 the "Butthurtfilled 3", because this game's multiplayer reeks of butthurt-filled kids. %)
 

master_chen

Honorable
Jun 20, 2012
1,215
0
11,360
Ezio:
Well, GTX 690 has 100% "price-to-performance" ratio. Titan would probably have something like "125~150%" after all tests, so...

Redeemer (Adios!):
Yeah, but that's three-monitor setup. Now re-calculate that performance to one-monitor setup with just one card in mind.
 

master_chen

Honorable
Jun 20, 2012
1,215
0
11,360
Best GTX 690 (EVGA's HCS) costs 1200$. Weakest GTX 690 (LOL EVGA's Again!) costs 1000$ right now.
Devil13 HD 7990 costs (before discontinuation) 880$, Ares II HD 7990 costs 1500$, Toxic HD 7970 6GB (THE Best HD 7970 ever made...discontinued) costs 740$.
So...what were you saying, again?
 
I believe releasing this card right now is more like a proof of concept than anything else. 1000$ cards are not the ones that make bulk money for the manufacturers, they just need to prove they have a better design coming up.

@Ezio: Nevermind this guy, he just likes to argue without a point.