Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

How powerful is GTX 675MX?

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
February 22, 2013 1:17:47 AM

Hi, does anybody have an actual experience of using GTX 675MX 4GB GDDR5 VRAM? How is it compare to desktop GTX 660ti? Much slower or just tiny differences? Thank you.

More about : powerful gtx 675mx

February 22, 2013 3:42:21 AM

Mobile graphics will never be as good as a discrete card...Passmark ranks the 675M at 52 and the 660ti at 6
m
0
l
February 22, 2013 3:54:58 AM

But I checked that 680M SLI is actually out perform a discrete GTX 680. I mean...seriously that much difference?
m
0
l
Related resources
February 22, 2013 4:02:08 AM

Typing said:
But I checked that 680M SLI is actually out perform a discrete GTX 680. I mean...seriously that much difference?


Might be possible...Take a look at these 2 graphs from Nvidia:

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt...

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt... (scroll down to the last graph)

the 675mx scores about 17000, and the 660 ti scores almost 35000....twice as powerful...you can look at a single 680M vs a 680 also.
m
0
l
a b U Graphics card
February 22, 2013 5:24:37 AM

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-675MX.8...

if you look to the lists of GPU's on the right, the 675MX is ranked below a 7870, so i reckon it performs anywhere between slightly worse to slightly better than a desktop 7850/660.

as for the 680M, it's ranked below the 660ti, but for the sake of simplicity, let's just say it performs equally to it. a dual SLI 660ti will outperform a single desktop 680

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-680-gef...

naturally two 680M's in SLI should perform better than the 680, though at a less wider margin than shown in the link above
m
0
l
a c 358 U Graphics card
February 22, 2013 5:28:17 AM

The mobile GTX 680MX is is basically equivalent to the desktop GTX 660 Ti. That obviously means the mobile GTX 675MX is slower than the GTX 660 Ti.

It would seem that the GTX 675MX is a rough equivalent to a GTX 560 Ti and a Radeon HD 6870. Wow, that means it's faster than my Radeon HD 5850.
m
0
l
February 22, 2013 5:42:05 AM

Yes I have plenty of experience using that particular GPU. While it is true that mobile GPU's will never be as powerful as desktop GPU's. This thing effin ROCKS! I can play All the games I own on high without a problem. Borderlands 2, Crysis, Doom 3 BFG edition, GTA IV, GTA San Andreas, Portal 2, Dishonered, Call of Duty Black Ops 2, Fallout 3, Skyrim, Minecraft(on fancy/far)... Everything. This GPU rocks. I love it and if you are playing games that are out now then you shouldn't have any issue's. Plus they just updated the mobile drivers today. Nvidia Rocks.
m
0
l
February 22, 2013 5:49:14 AM

jaguarskx said:
The mobile GTX 680MX is is basically equivalent to the desktop GTX 660 Ti. That obviously means the mobile GTX 675MX is slower than the GTX 660 Ti.


Where did you hear that at? a 660Ti is more powerful than a 680MX acording to Nvidia 3dmark
m
0
l
February 22, 2013 6:20:31 AM

Take those "benchmarks" with a grain of salt. I don't even run them. My laptop plays all of the newest games there is, and it plays them flawlessly. CoD BO2 I get ~100 FPS, Borderlands 2 ~ 57-90. I say get it, you wont regret it. Screw them benchmarks. They aren't real world testing. They are simulated averages for computers. Why spend $200 extra for a GPU that isn't going to improve a game that can only look so good in the first place?
m
0
l
February 22, 2013 4:14:17 PM

Thank you guys for help!
m
0
l
!