Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question
Closed

5760x1080 Eyefinity on HD 7870

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
a b U Graphics card
March 3, 2013 4:07:30 PM

Is a mini-displayport to vga adapter the best solution for connecting 3 displays that don't have display ports?
a b U Graphics card
March 3, 2013 4:46:16 PM

farrengottu said:
but if vga is all you have than you need "active displayport to vga adapters". active being the key word.


You do realize that all displayport to vga adapters actively convert the signal from digital to analog right?
Score
0
Related resources
a b U Graphics card
March 3, 2013 5:19:47 PM

slomo4sho said:
You do realize that all displayport to vga adapters actively convert the signal from digital to analog right?


your clearly not familiar with what active and passive means on display port adapters.
ill explain from the beginning.

Eyefinity requires an ACTIVE adapter to enable a third monitor on HD 5000 cards or higher. Passive will NOT work, except for two monitors on a triple setup or the first two monitors on the eyefinity 5 and eyefinity 6 cards. For the other three/four monitors, active is still required. A quick explanation of why is because DVI/HDMI requires a special clock, which the card is only able to provide two of. Displayport does not use this clock, so ATI used it as a workaround.

An active adapter converts a true displayport signal into DVI/HDMI/VGA/whatever else. It will have either a converter chip or a DAC built in to do said conversion.

Passive adapters are merely a cable to go from displayport to DVI/HDMI/VGA/w.e. The video card detects the monitor as such, and outputs the required signal (DVI/HDMI/VGA). This does require one of the two aformentioned clocks, hence why they do not work with eyefinity cards.
Active adapters, on the other hand recieve a displayport signal from the video card, and convert it to DVI/HDMI/VGA. They will always have some sort of onboard DAC or video converter chip which they use to convert the dp signal. Lately, most everyone has been referring the DAC ones (which are the converters that go DP->VGA) as 'passive.' This is not the case.
Score
0
a b U Graphics card
March 4, 2013 6:19:11 AM

I am aware of what active and passive adapters are. Maybe I should have elaborated in my OP. I am looking for the most economical solution(please don't suggest a DV to dual link DVI adapter which requires external power via USB).

DP to VGA active adapters run $10-30 and DP to single link DVI seem to be a minimum of $30.

My current setup with nVidia is with a card that has a DVI, HDMI, and VGA connector and there is no discernible difference in quality at 1080P between the three screens. My monitors have connections for all three inputs (DVI, HDMI, and VGA) so I hold no reservations towards any single connector. Nonetheless, I am unsure why you would shun VGA as a viable output for 1080P.
Score
0
a c 273 U Graphics card
March 4, 2013 6:46:40 AM

You may or may not get a slightly "wavy" picture with VGA which is why people tend to avoid it these days.
Score
0

Best solution

a b U Graphics card
March 4, 2013 12:54:22 PM

The DP to DVI adapters no longer need USB power and I would avoid the ones that do. Those were the first generation adapters which were always problematic. Current adapters DO NOT require a USB plug. My adapter that did require the USB plug all of a sudden stopped working within 2 months of the newer type of plugs (that ATI endorsed) coming out. (Yet if I rolled back to a previous driver the adapter worked again).

Mini DP to DVI
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...

DP to DVI
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E168...
Share
a b U Graphics card
March 4, 2013 3:20:49 PM

Best answer selected by slomo4sho.
Score
0
a b U Graphics card
March 4, 2013 3:22:26 PM

The powercolor apapter fits the bill. Thanks.
Score
0
!