Sony T616 camera

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

Can any give me their feedback on the picture quality of the sony T616.
I find mine very grainy and lacks color depth...esp i compare it to my
friends lower end LG phone. Welcome to email some pics for me to compare
with my phone. ayrton2112@yahoo.ca


Thank u in advance

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

I agree 100%. Compared with my T68 with MCA-25 (I think that's the camera)
it's lousy. The MCA-25 with a T68 is far superior in picture quality, plus
it has a resolution up to 640x480. That's far more useful than the silly
320x200 (not really the resolution, but something worse). Then again, I'm
buying a phone for a phone and not the camera. If I wanted a cheap camera I
can get a 2 MP.


"Jason Cothran" <reply@board.nomail> wrote in message
news:IJzmc.31972$UG2.31087@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>
> "AYRTON" <ayrtonsweb@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
> news:nhxmc.4258$_o1.667677@read2.cgocable.net...
> | Can any give me their feedback on the picture quality of the sony T616.
> | I find mine very grainy and lacks color depth...esp i compare it to my
> | friends lower end LG phone. Welcome to email some pics for me to
compare
> | with my phone. ayrton2112@yahoo.ca
> |
> |
>
> The T616 has a very bad camera on it. I love the phone, but the camera is
> nothing more than a novelty on this particular phone. If you are wanting
> better picture quality out of GSM, you may want to turn towards the moto
> v600.
>
>
>