Bluetooth headset for T610

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

Dirk G. Straka wrote:
> Hello over there,
>
> can anybody tell me the main differences between HBH-65 and
> HBH-35, please? Esp. why the HBH-65 seems to be rated higher
> than the 35?
>
> Comparing standby and talking times the HBH-35 seems to be much
> better (120/5 vs 75/2.5 h), but, nevertheless, the HBH-65 is more
> expensive. Functionality seems to be nearly the same, too ...
>
> Can anybody explain this contradiction to me?
>
> Thx in advance, Dirk

Functionality is very much the same. I chose the HBH-60 over the HBH-35
because of size only. As you said, battery lifetime is much better on
the '35, but you have to plan where to carry it when out and about.
There is room for the "sixties" almost anywhere.

The HBH-35 got very good reviews in a comprehensive magazine test I
read. The sound quality in noisy environments (pedestrian in heavy
traffic) was one of it's strong points.

This does not explain the price difference you mentioned, does it? Sorry...

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

Do not buy either, as the new model came out. HBH-600
We have them on our web site on sale!!!

--
Samuel Bentolila
Cellpoint Corporation
http://www.cellpoint.net
Tel. 954-927-9998


"fm" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:ZVhHc.2975$Mq3.58430@news4.e.nsc.no...
> Dirk G. Straka wrote:
> > Hello over there,
> >
> > can anybody tell me the main differences between HBH-65 and
> > HBH-35, please? Esp. why the HBH-65 seems to be rated higher
> > than the 35?
> >
> > Comparing standby and talking times the HBH-35 seems to be much
> > better (120/5 vs 75/2.5 h), but, nevertheless, the HBH-65 is more
> > expensive. Functionality seems to be nearly the same, too ...
> >
> > Can anybody explain this contradiction to me?
> >
> > Thx in advance, Dirk
>
> Functionality is very much the same. I chose the HBH-60 over the HBH-35
> because of size only. As you said, battery lifetime is much better on
> the '35, but you have to plan where to carry it when out and about.
> There is room for the "sixties" almost anywhere.
>
> The HBH-35 got very good reviews in a comprehensive magazine test I
> read. The sound quality in noisy environments (pedestrian in heavy
> traffic) was one of it's strong points.
>
> This does not explain the price difference you mentioned, does it?
Sorry...

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)

Hi,
Have you heard of Marketing ?
That's the reason ....

From a technical point of view they are very close, only the microphone
pick-up for the 65 is less than for the 35 due to the distance from mouth to
mic.
But Marketing boys (or girls ?) think they can ask more money ..... :>))

Bernd

"fm" <postmaster@127.0.0.1> schreef in bericht
news:ZVhHc.2975$Mq3.58430@news4.e.nsc.no...
> Dirk G. Straka wrote:
> > Hello over there,
> >
> > can anybody tell me the main differences between HBH-65 and
> > HBH-35, please? Esp. why the HBH-65 seems to be rated higher
> > than the 35?
> >
> > Comparing standby and talking times the HBH-35 seems to be much
> > better (120/5 vs 75/2.5 h), but, nevertheless, the HBH-65 is more
> > expensive. Functionality seems to be nearly the same, too ...
> >
> > Can anybody explain this contradiction to me?
> >
> > Thx in advance, Dirk
>
> Functionality is very much the same. I chose the HBH-60 over the HBH-35
> because of size only. As you said, battery lifetime is much better on
> the '35, but you have to plan where to carry it when out and about.
> There is room for the "sixties" almost anywhere.
>
> The HBH-35 got very good reviews in a comprehensive magazine test I
> read. The sound quality in noisy environments (pedestrian in heavy
> traffic) was one of it's strong points.
>
> This does not explain the price difference you mentioned, does it?
Sorry...