Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)
I have a T68i, which is a fine little phone, fully specced, if a little slow
witted in the menu selection, and texting can be quicker with a quill and ink .
.. .
But it works fine, so to any other former T68i users out there, is it worth
moving up to a T630 or even a k700i??
Both of these handsets are now available quite cheaply in the UK (BTMobile T630
for £9.99pm, or o2 K700i for £20pm), so I'm thinking about changing as I like a
bargain.
So is the T68i a classic, or worth changing now?
thanks
Andrew
replying? delete killspam from @aol.com******** and shoot any spammers you
meet ;-)
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)
> But it works fine, so to any other former T68i users out there, is it
worth
> moving up to a T630 or even a k700i??
> Both of these handsets are now available quite cheaply in the UK (BTMobile
T630
> for £9.99pm, or o2 K700i for £20pm), so I'm thinking about changing as I
like a
> bargain.
>
> So is the T68i a classic, or worth changing now?
>
Unless you want a new cam-phone I'd say: don't give it away aslong as it
works fine
T68i is a good phone.
T630 is a cam phone but bad battery-performance. Poor RF (signal reception)
capabilities.
K700i is said to have good RF performance. Also a good camera BUT horrible
bettery life. (Some users tell less than a day...)
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)
"Oliver Bobon" <a0308484@unet.univie.ac.at> wrote in
news:41261ead$0$29554$91cee783@newsreader01.highway.telekom.at:
>
>> But it works fine, so to any other former T68i users out there, is it
> worth
>> moving up to a T630 or even a k700i??
>> Both of these handsets are now available quite cheaply in the UK
>> (BTMobile
> T630
>> for £9.99pm, or o2 K700i for £20pm), so I'm thinking about changing
>> as I
> like a
>> bargain.
>>
>> So is the T68i a classic, or worth changing now?
>>
>
> Unless you want a new cam-phone I'd say: don't give it away aslong as
> it works fine >
> T68i is a good phone.
> T630 is a cam phone but bad battery-performance. Poor RF (signal
> reception) capabilities.
>
> K700i is said to have good RF performance. Also a good camera BUT
> horrible bettery life. (Some users tell less than a day...)
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.ericsson (More info?)
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.ericsson - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <20040820084830.05710.00003493@mb-m14.aol.com> on 20 Aug 2004 12:48:30 GMT,
ajh400@aol.comkillspam (AJH400) wrote:
> I have a T68i, which is a fine little phone, fully specced, if a little slow
>witted in the menu selection, and texting can be quicker with a quill and ink .
>. .
And the RF is only so-so.
>But it works fine, so to any other former T68i users out there, is it worth
>moving up to a T630 or even a k700i??
Consider also the Z600, a rather nice piece of kit if you like the clamshell
form factor.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.