"Harry Houdini" wrote ...
> Just out of curiosity - does anyone know why XLR cables almost
> never have the shield connected? How would it afftect things if it
> were connected?
Presumably you mean the connector shell and not the cable
shield (screen)? Seems highly doubtful that you could get
away with leaving the shield floating.
OTOH, making a connection to the shell (at either end)
appears to be nowhere near as critical. I suspect that people
who operate in high RF areas can't be as casual about that as
the rest of us.
"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote in message
news:113rlms1n5omc94@corp.supernews.com...
> "Harry Houdini" wrote ...
>> Just out of curiosity - does anyone know why XLR cables almost never have
>> the shield connected? How would it afftect things if it were connected?
>
> Presumably you mean the connector shell and not the cable
> shield (screen)? Seems highly doubtful that you could get
> away with leaving the shield floating.
>
> OTOH, making a connection to the shell (at either end)
> appears to be nowhere near as critical. I suspect that people who operate
> in high RF areas can't be as casual about that as the rest of us.
Not casual - deliberate. If you are going through a stage ar wall box, with
multiple connectors, you will instantly have lots of potential ground loops
which are very susceptible to rf interference. Even just a single cable
connected to a grounded metal wall box will likely cause problems.
The shell of any panel-mounted *metal* flange XLR connector, say on a
facilities panel or wallbox, is usually grounded by its corner or radial
screws to the metalwork, assuming that the panel *is* already grounded - for
Safety reasons. When a flying lead *metal* case XLR connector (male or
female, 3 -pole or more) is inserted there, its shell gets automatically
grounded. Therefore it should not be linked to pin 1 which would get
grounded twice!.
If using lightweight *plastic* XLRs, Caution - there is not always a 4th
pole embedded in the connector.
XLR pin 1 is supposed to be longer than the other two - and so mates first
and breaks last, allegedly.
But the *shell connection tag* of the wandering end metal-cased 3-pole
female XLR cable socket should be linked to pin 1 to make the microphone (or
whatever source) safe and immune from RF.
I always connected studio mic cables' and mic extenders' XLR females from
pin 1 to shell.
Even if the signal-pair part of the cable in a technical area is
interruptible by normalling jacks and patching, the screen should be
continuous to ground.
No matter what series length and how many add-on extenders are used, pin 1
should be traceable to the active electronics chassis elsewhere, which good
practice dictates is always at robust ground potential.
I believe the same philosophy does not always go for *shell connection tag*
of studio/gig wander ends with metal-cased 3-pole MALE XLR plugs used for
taking feeds, foldback, etc.
ANOMALY... If o/p cable metal connector shells are always linked to their
pin1, should the metalwork for an i/p cable accidentally touch the metalwork
for an o/p cable on stage or in a studio, there could be a subtle ground
loop.
As I re-call connecting the shield to the shell creates a ground loop
finder.
Handy if you need ground loops.
Harry Houdini wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just out of curiosity - does anyone know why XLR cables almost never
> have the shield connected? How would it afftect things if it were
> connected?
>
> Harry
--
Hope this helps
Bill Mayhew
Mayhew & Company, Rental, Sales, Service
<http://www.mayhewco.com>
On 20 Mar 2005 13:38:05 -0600, Harry Houdini <harry@houdini.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just out of curiosity - does anyone know why XLR cables almost
never
> have the shield connected? How would it afftect things if it were
> connected?
>
> Harry
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:02:35 -0800, "Richard Crowley"
<rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote:
>"Harry Houdini" wrote ...
>> Just out of curiosity - does anyone know why XLR cables almost
>> never have the shield connected? How would it afftect things if it
>> were connected?
>
>Presumably you mean the connector shell and not the cable
>shield (screen)? Seems highly doubtful that you could get
>away with leaving the shield floating.
>
>OTOH, making a connection to the shell (at either end)
>appears to be nowhere near as critical. I suspect that people
>who operate in high RF areas can't be as casual about that as
>the rest of us.
I am, in fact, setting up two junction panels with lots of Mic
interconnets. Do you suggest connecting to the chasis of the metal
face-plates?
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:29:54 +1200, "Geoff Wood"
<geoff@nospam-paf.co.nz> wrote:
>
>"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote in message
>news:113rlms1n5omc94@corp.supernews.com...
>> "Harry Houdini" wrote ...
>>> Just out of curiosity - does anyone know why XLR cables almost never have
>>> the shield connected? How would it afftect things if it were connected?
>>
>> Presumably you mean the connector shell and not the cable
>> shield (screen)? Seems highly doubtful that you could get
>> away with leaving the shield floating.
>>
>> OTOH, making a connection to the shell (at either end)
>> appears to be nowhere near as critical. I suspect that people who operate
>> in high RF areas can't be as casual about that as the rest of us.
>
>Not casual - deliberate. If you are going through a stage ar wall box, with
>multiple connectors, you will instantly have lots of potential ground loops
>which are very susceptible to rf interference. Even just a single cable
>connected to a grounded metal wall box will likely cause problems.
>
>
>geoff
>
Thank you for your thoughtful and generous response.
Questions: So if I understand you correctly, I should ground the panel
chassis and then solder the XLR interconnect shells to the chassis?
Then, I should solder the shells of any XLR cables going into/out of
the panels to pin 1. Right?
Can I connect the chassis plates to the ground on a nearby AC line or
do I have to run a separate line?
Can I connect both junction faces to the same ground?
Kind regards,
Harry
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:08:18 GMT, "Jim Gregory"
<jim.greg@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>The shell of any panel-mounted *metal* flange XLR connector, say on a
>facilities panel or wallbox, is usually grounded by its corner or radial
>screws to the metalwork, assuming that the panel *is* already grounded - for
>Safety reasons. When a flying lead *metal* case XLR connector (male or
>female, 3 -pole or more) is inserted there, its shell gets automatically
>grounded. Therefore it should not be linked to pin 1 which would get
>grounded twice!.
>If using lightweight *plastic* XLRs, Caution - there is not always a 4th
>pole embedded in the connector.
>XLR pin 1 is supposed to be longer than the other two - and so mates first
>and breaks last, allegedly.
>But the *shell connection tag* of the wandering end metal-cased 3-pole
>female XLR cable socket should be linked to pin 1 to make the microphone (or
>whatever source) safe and immune from RF.
>I always connected studio mic cables' and mic extenders' XLR females from
>pin 1 to shell.
>Even if the signal-pair part of the cable in a technical area is
>interruptible by normalling jacks and patching, the screen should be
>continuous to ground.
>No matter what series length and how many add-on extenders are used, pin 1
>should be traceable to the active electronics chassis elsewhere, which good
>practice dictates is always at robust ground potential.
>I believe the same philosophy does not always go for *shell connection tag*
>of studio/gig wander ends with metal-cased 3-pole MALE XLR plugs used for
>taking feeds, foldback, etc.
>ANOMALY... If o/p cable metal connector shells are always linked to their
>pin1, should the metalwork for an i/p cable accidentally touch the metalwork
>for an o/p cable on stage or in a studio, there could be a subtle ground
>loop.
>
"Harry Houdini" <harry@houdini.com> wrote in message
news:uqht3195emjpggs7qkh6kqu4o6si27k33l@4ax.com...
> Geoff,
>
> Your input is appreciated! Thank you.
>
> I am, in fact, setting up two junction panels with lots of Mic
> interconnets. Do you suggest connecting to the chasis of the metal
> face-plates?
That is a little difficult to avoid in all but all-plastic sockets !
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.