All,
I'm benching with my memory with different settings using Sisoft Sandra, but haven't seen any major changes. I've tried setting the CL to 2 and 2.5, and tried the least and most aggressive settings with both. End result: Insignificant bandwith changes. I lowered the FSB to 134 for these tests, the default for the board.
My Question: Does the fact that my PC booted with the CL2 and the aggressive timings mean that I'm getting true CL2 results? Also, if I was using true CL2 instead of 2.5 running at CL2, would I see a difference? Finally, I'm getting the feeling that the "bandwith" that I'm measuring might not change regardless of these settings, in which case I'm an idiot. Thanks in advance.
My System:
XP 2000
A7V333 at 134FSB
1x512 Samsung PC2700
80G Maxtor (ATA133, yeah right)
AIW 7500
Life's a hole...dig it. - Joe Dirt
I'm benching with my memory with different settings using Sisoft Sandra, but haven't seen any major changes. I've tried setting the CL to 2 and 2.5, and tried the least and most aggressive settings with both. End result: Insignificant bandwith changes. I lowered the FSB to 134 for these tests, the default for the board.
My Question: Does the fact that my PC booted with the CL2 and the aggressive timings mean that I'm getting true CL2 results? Also, if I was using true CL2 instead of 2.5 running at CL2, would I see a difference? Finally, I'm getting the feeling that the "bandwith" that I'm measuring might not change regardless of these settings, in which case I'm an idiot. Thanks in advance.
My System:
XP 2000
A7V333 at 134FSB
1x512 Samsung PC2700
80G Maxtor (ATA133, yeah right)
AIW 7500
Life's a hole...dig it. - Joe Dirt