OK, after that last discussion, I'm almost scared to ask!
However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon (DCM-320,
five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous. Does anyone on the
'tech' side have any recommendations about what to get in terms of a good,
solid, well-constructed, sonically transparent CD player? Any of multi-disc
capabilities, SACD, and digital outputs would be nice but not essential
bonuses.
>OK, after that last discussion, I'm almost scared to ask!
>
>However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon (DCM-320,
>five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous. Does anyone on the
>'tech' side have any recommendations about what to get in terms of a good,
>solid, well-constructed, sonically transparent CD player? Any of multi-disc
>capabilities, SACD, and digital outputs would be nice but not essential
>bonuses.
If you stay away from the 'high end' labels, they pretty much all
sound the same these days - that's a *good* thing, BTW - so my advice
would be to get a well-made 'universal' player such as one of the
Pioneer or Denon range.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:08:04 GMT, "Colin B."
> <cbigam@somewhereelse.nucleus.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, after that last discussion, I'm almost scared to ask!
>>
>> However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon
>> (DCM-320, five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous. Does
>> anyone on the 'tech' side have any recommendations about what to get
>> in terms of a good, solid, well-constructed, sonically transparent
>> CD player? Any of multi-disc capabilities, SACD, and digital outputs
>> would be nice but not essential bonuses.
>
> If you stay away from the 'high end' labels, they pretty much all
> sound the same these days - that's a *good* thing, BTW - so my advice
> would be to get a well-made 'universal' player such as one of the
> Pioneer or Denon range.
Denon optical players of recent vintage have very poor reliability in my
experience.
Colin B. wrote:
> OK, after that last discussion, I'm almost scared to ask!
>
> However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon
(DCM-320,
> five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous. Does anyone on
the
> 'tech' side have any recommendations about what to get in terms of a
good,
> solid, well-constructed, sonically transparent CD player? Any of
multi-disc
> capabilities, SACD, and digital outputs would be nice but not
essential
> bonuses.
>
> Thanks,
> Colin
Both Stewart and Mark make valid points. The Denon and Pioneer are
fabulous products for both music and video.
The Denon 3910 which is the latest here in the UK, has a poor
reliablity record with a number of bugs in the software which are being
fixed as we type.
I do believe that the worst is over in terms of glitches with the Denon
product, but on the other hand who am I to say!!
The Pioneer is also state of the art, what ever that means?
I would suggest another brand here and that is the Arcam DV79 DVD
player, which is also a "universal" although doesnt do SACD. It has
excellent stereo performance, as good as any competent CD only player,
plus the icing on the cake is the HDMI video connection, that is of
course if you use a DVD player!?
If you arent into DVD then any Arcam CD only player will not only give
fantastic performance, but are very very good value for money.
On 21 Apr 2005 05:14:30 -0700, "Shiner" <shiner9@btinternet.com>
wrote:
>
>Colin B. wrote:
>> OK, after that last discussion, I'm almost scared to ask!
>>
>> However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon (DCM-320,
>> five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous. Does anyone on the
>> 'tech' side have any recommendations about what to get in terms of a good,
>> solid, well-constructed, sonically transparent CD player? Any of multi-disc
>> capabilities, SACD, and digital outputs would be nice but not essential
>> bonuses.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Colin
>
>Both Stewart and Mark make valid points. The Denon and Pioneer are
>fabulous products for both music and video.
>The Denon 3910 which is the latest here in the UK, has a poor
>reliablity record with a number of bugs in the software which are being
>fixed as we type.
>
>I do believe that the worst is over in terms of glitches with the Denon
>product, but on the other hand who am I to say!!
>The Pioneer is also state of the art, what ever that means?
>I would suggest another brand here and that is the Arcam DV79 DVD
>player, which is also a "universal" although doesnt do SACD. It has
>excellent stereo performance, as good as any competent CD only player,
>plus the icing on the cake is the HDMI video connection, that is of
>course if you use a DVD player!?
>
>If you arent into DVD then any Arcam CD only player will not only give
>fantastic performance, but are very very good value for money.
Given that my current Pioneer DV-575A cost £109, plays any kind of
silver disc, and in a level-matched blind test sounds identical to a
'state of the art' £2200 Meridian 588 'dedicated' CD player, I'd say
that your 'value for money' recommendation is doubtful. :-)
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Shiner <shiner9@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Colin B. wrote:
> > However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon
> > (DCM-320, five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous.
Curiously the CD shop in my street had 3 Denon players. Only one
is still working and IIRC, I was told that the other 2 broke down
almost at the same time.
A pity since it had an interesting feature for a CD shop: a knob to
fast-forward or reverse through a track. Much more prectical than
the usual 2 buttons.
If you want another changer and you are in the USA there are several
universal changers:
Considering the prices of DVD players, the main advantage of a CD player
might be the mechanical noise. Many DVD players are a bit/quite noisy.
Of course the more expensive models should be quieter (are they ?).
Stewart Pinkerton <patent3@dircon.co.uk> wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2005 05:14:30 -0700, "Shiner" <shiner9@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>Colin B. wrote:
>>> OK, after that last discussion, I'm almost scared to ask!
>>>
>>> However, I'm looking to get a new CD player, as my ancient Denon (DCM-320,
>>> five disc changer) is starting to get cantankerous. Does anyone on the
>>> 'tech' side have any recommendations about what to get in terms of a good,
>>> solid, well-constructed, sonically transparent CD player? Any of multi-disc
>>> capabilities, SACD, and digital outputs would be nice but not essential
>>> bonuses.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Colin
>>
>>Both Stewart and Mark make valid points. The Denon and Pioneer are
>>fabulous products for both music and video.
>>The Denon 3910 which is the latest here in the UK, has a poor
>>reliablity record with a number of bugs in the software which are being
>>fixed as we type.
>>
>>I do believe that the worst is over in terms of glitches with the Denon
>>product, but on the other hand who am I to say!!
>>The Pioneer is also state of the art, what ever that means?
>>I would suggest another brand here and that is the Arcam DV79 DVD
>>player, which is also a "universal" although doesnt do SACD. It has
>>excellent stereo performance, as good as any competent CD only player,
>>plus the icing on the cake is the HDMI video connection, that is of
>>course if you use a DVD player!?
>>
>>If you arent into DVD then any Arcam CD only player will not only give
>>fantastic performance, but are very very good value for money.
>
> Given that my current Pioneer DV-575A cost ?109, plays any kind of
> silver disc, and in a level-matched blind test sounds identical to a
> 'state of the art' ?2200 Meridian 588 'dedicated' CD player, I'd say
> that your 'value for money' recommendation is doubtful. :-)
Heh. Well to be fair, the style and build quality of Arcam are worth some
amount of change. How much is of course personal.
No DVD for me--the stereo and TV are on different floors, and will likely
remain that way as long as we have this house. DVD-Audio wouldn't hurt,
though. Hmm. Neither would having a CDR burner attached to the stereo...
>>>If you arent into DVD then any Arcam CD only player will not only give
>>>fantastic performance, but are very very good value for money.
>>
>> Given that my current Pioneer DV-575A cost £109, plays any kind of
>> silver disc, and in a level-matched blind test sounds identical to a
>> 'state of the art' £2200 Meridian 588 'dedicated' CD player, I'd say
>> that your 'value for money' recommendation is doubtful. :-)
>
>Heh. Well to be fair, the style and build quality of Arcam are worth some
>amount of change. How much is of course personal.
Build quality? Arcam? You're kidding, right? Take similarly priced
Arcam and Pioneer/Denon players, and the Arcam 'build quality' is
quite simply a joke. I've always been a great fan of Arcam equipment,
especially their top of the range stuff, but build quality was never
one of their big things, nor to be honest is value for money in purely
sonic terms, now that the universal players have become fully mature.
Even my 'Chinky cheapy' Pioneer DV-575A has immaculate sonic
performance.
>No DVD for me--the stereo and TV are on different floors, and will likely
>remain that way as long as we have this house. DVD-Audio wouldn't hurt,
>though. Hmm. Neither would having a CDR burner attached to the stereo...
You don't *have* to have video connected in order to benefit from a
'universal' player, although a small screen is often necessary to
navigate the menus for some types of disc.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
Of course Value for money is a personal thing, as Colin says. I have
not seen or heard the Pioneer, that you talk of, so I will bow to your
superior knowledge of these products.
I have demo'd the Arcam DV29 which was fine in with build quality. The
one I had on home load was anyway, mind you the remote was awful an
vague.! Didnt buy it though as it was bloody expensive for what it
offered.
Steer clear of the Yamaha and Onkyo models. Neither build their own, you
just paying them to rebrand someone else's stuff. Both companies source most
of their models through Philips, which is a big black mark against them in
my opinion, PARTICULARLY in regards to low-medium priced stuff. Philips' DVD
pickups die like flies. An occasional Yamaha model is sourced through
Panasonic, but they have very common problems also.
Personally, I'd go Pioneer, though I am concerned about maybe needing to use
the video monitor just to access some normal music playing functions. In my
experience their reliability, and the apparent quality of the D/A converters
and analog stage would be the determining factors. To be truthful however, I
haven't listened to one at home, only in the shop.
Stewart Pinkerton <patent3@dircon.co.uk> wrote:
> Build quality? Arcam? You're kidding, right? Take similarly priced
> Arcam and Pioneer/Denon players, and the Arcam 'build quality' is
> quite simply a joke. I've always been a great fan of Arcam equipment,
> especially their top of the range stuff, but build quality was never
> one of their big things, nor to be honest is value for money in purely
> sonic terms, now that the universal players have become fully mature.
> Even my 'Chinky cheapy' Pioneer DV-575A has immaculate sonic
> performance.
Hmm. Maybe it's just the old integrated amps from Arcam that I've had good
luck with. I assumed it would carry across, but apparently not.
> You don't *have* to have video connected in order to benefit from a
> 'universal' player, although a small screen is often necessary to
> navigate the menus for some types of disc.
Well that's seems utterly silly. It's looking like I can't get a new CD
player unless I buy a new TV as well, or give up on music that's coming
out on the new formats. Is it my imagination, or is #$&*#@ Home Theatre
making it harder to get a pure stereo system?
>> You don't *have* to have video connected in order to benefit from a
>> 'universal' player, although a small screen is often necessary to
>> navigate the menus for some types of disc.
>
>Well that's seems utterly silly. It's looking like I can't get a new CD
>player unless I buy a new TV as well, or give up on music that's coming
>out on the new formats. Is it my imagination, or is #$&*#@ Home Theatre
>making it harder to get a pure stereo system?
It's not your imagination, it's market forces! :-)
And all you need is a small cheap monitor screen, hardly a big
imposition. Besides, most 'universal' players will default to standard
2-channel 'stereo' output if you just shove a CD in the slot. It tends
to be things like MP3, DVD-A and SACD that require menu navigation.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.