hello, i own a pair of Behringer Truth monitors. the treble sounds
like 2 people having a sword fight 3 inches from my ear drum. anyone
got any tips on damping the titanium dome tweeter.
also I've got polystyrene stuck in the ports to damp those too. it
helps! can anyone recommend a different material for this.
Garrt wrote:
> hello, i own a pair of Behringer Truth monitors. the treble sounds
> like 2 people having a sword fight 3 inches from my ear drum. anyone
> got any tips on damping the titanium dome tweeter.
>
> also I've got polystyrene stuck in the ports to damp those too. it
> helps! can anyone recommend a different material for this.
>
> TIA for any help.
>
I just want to say that while I don't know how to dampen them, though I
am certain someone will. It has nothing to do with the titanium I don't
believe. Some of the best tweeters sold are titanium. I think it's
they are not the best available. i.e. an inexpensive tweeter is going
to usually sound harsh and then depending how it's crossed over etc.
My best GUESS is that Behringer as a marketing ploy to say they have
titanium tweeters in the system got the least expensive pair they could
find and put them in.
"Garrt" <le_kernel@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1122647510.444677.248200@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
> hello, i own a pair of Behringer Truth monitors. the
> treble sounds like 2 people having a sword fight 3 inches
> from my ear drum. anyone got any tips on damping the
> titanium dome tweeter.
I've heard the Behringer Truths many times, and I can say
for sure that if the treble sounds too hot, then the source
is too hot.
I take it these are the passive models, because the active
models have a 4-position treble switch on the back.
> also I've got polystyrene stuck in the ports to damp
> those too. it helps! can anyone recommend a different
> material for this.
> I take it these are the passive models, because the active
> models have a 4-position treble switch on the back.
Active model - positions are +2(err),0,-2 and -4. I use them at -2.
at -4 the treble it too low in volume and still harsh! even Vinyl is
harsh thru em but CD/sound card is worse. they sound a lot better once
the amps have warmed up.
In article <1122647510.444677.248200@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Garrt" <le_kernel@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> hello, i own a pair of Behringer Truth monitors. the treble sounds
> like 2 people having a sword fight 3 inches from my ear drum. anyone
> got any tips on damping the titanium dome tweeter.
>
> also I've got polystyrene stuck in the ports to damp those too. it
> helps! can anyone recommend a different material for this.
>
> TIA for any help.
There could be a number of problems going on, but probably the biggest
one is that these are not great speakers. OK for the money, but not much
more than that.
I think that what's really going on is that your ears are better than
your speakers! :-) I think that Behringer is counting on most of their
customers not really hearing this problem. Monitors are a very personal
thing and a lot records have been mixed on speakers I would consider
unlistenable. If you can't afford other speakers, see if you can find a
reference that you know sounds good. Use that to judge the amount of
swordfighting you hear and try to match your recordings with that. If
you are using these speakers for listening pleasure, well, perhaps you
might explore other options.
> I think that what's really going on is that your ears are better than
> your speakers! :-)
I think you're right ;-) like a lot of people my monitors double as my
hi-fi. the main point I'm making is that these monitors cause ear
fatigue which is bad for mixing. I just want to make them sound as
good as they can and if that means sticking foam in the ports then
that's what I'll do!
any recommendations for alternatives? I've always fancied some Event
monitors TR5/8. it's a war zone out there - every product gets slated
by someone - even Dynaudio/Genelec etc.... pro audio people are worse
than hi-fi buffs sometimes!
perhaps not... I have them set up in an anechoic chamber. despite this
the distance from the rear walls is different to the corners by the
recommended ration of 1:1.342. the truths are toe'd in to form the
IEEE standard equilateral triangle and my listening chair is poitioned
within 30 nanometers of the ideal sweet spot. I have dedicated D/A
converters which are 10 meters away from any possible interference out
of my laptop which always runs off battery power. I use solid silver
core cables which are, naturally, balanced. I've had my hearing tested
recently and it's damn good........so that leaves the speakers as the
only posible problem area!
In article <1122665376.855945.31900@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Garrt" <le_kernel@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > I think that what's really going on is that your ears are better than
> > your speakers! :-)
>
> I think you're right ;-) like a lot of people my monitors double as my
> hi-fi. the main point I'm making is that these monitors cause ear
> fatigue which is bad for mixing. I just want to make them sound as
> good as they can and if that means sticking foam in the ports then
> that's what I'll do!
>
> any recommendations for alternatives? I've always fancied some Event
> monitors TR5/8. it's a war zone out there - every product gets slated
> by someone - even Dynaudio/Genelec etc.... pro audio people are worse
> than hi-fi buffs sometimes!
>
> later Garrt.
I'm using JBL LSRP25s for recording (I was using Tannoy passive reveals
before that. Great monitor for the money and I do have them for sale, if
you are interested). For listening, I have a pair of B&W DM330s that I
got for $30. I wouldn't mix on them, but with some tissue paper in front
of the tweeters, they aren't half bad. The JBLs are nice because they
seem to have a wider sweet spot than a lot of other less expensive
monitors and they have pretty hefty amps built into them. I use them for
remote recording situations and they work out great for dealing with all
kinds of weird acoustic situations. They also crank. They get too loud
before they start really breaking up.
I also have some other random speakers, including ADS 540s and
Wharfedale 3 ways from the 70s that are pretty cool as well as some
Paradigm Mini Mk IIIs (very nice for their size and price!).
I am thinking about maybe looking at some of the passive Dynaudio BM5s
for my studio room. For $500 or so, they seem like a pretty good deal.
"Garrt" <le_kernel@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1122665376.855945.31900@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
> any recommendations for alternatives? I've always
> fancied some Event monitors TR5/8. it's a war zone out
> there - every product gets slated by someone - even
> Dynaudio/Genelec etc.... pro audio people are worse than
> hi-fi buffs sometimes!
The most generally highly-regarded studio monitors on the US
market today are probably Mackie HR 824s.
> The most generally highly-regarded studio monitors on the US
> market today are probably Mackie HR 824s.
yeah, they sounded good in the shop but cost too much! things tend to
be that bit more in the UK! there are so many options I'll have to
wait til I find something right - tempted to go back to passive
monitors. my instincts are telling me that the really good stuff just
isn't stocked by most music stores.
> hello, i own a pair of Behringer Truth monitors. the treble sounds
> like 2 people having a sword fight 3 inches from my ear drum. anyone
> got any tips on damping the titanium dome tweeter.
> also I've got polystyrene stuck in the ports to damp those too. it
> helps! can anyone recommend a different material for this.
> TIA for any help.
Give the KEF Coda range a listen, based on specs only, not on a listen
to a recent model, you may like them.
Kind regards
Peter Larsen
--
*******************************************
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
*******************************************
> Give the KEF Coda range a listen, based on specs only, not on a listen
> to a recent model, you may like them.
i had a pair of KEF coda ?x? - little speakers. very pleasant. the
tweater was underneath the woofer! made some good mixes on those but
there wasn't much bass. maybe it's time to come home?
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:5eSdne3dcqH_LHHfRVn-qg@comcast.com...
> The most generally highly-regarded studio monitors on the US
> market today are probably Mackie HR 824s.
There would be a *huge* number of studio's with Genelec, Dynaudio and JBL,
that would disagree with that comment.
"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:42eee2b1$0$12027$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
> news:5eSdne3dcqH_LHHfRVn-qg@comcast.com...
>> The most generally highly-regarded studio monitors on
>> the US market today are probably Mackie HR 824s.
>
> There would be a *huge* number of studio's with Genelec,
> Dynaudio and JBL, that would disagree with that comment.
Of course they would. But there are less of them. ;-)
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:e6idnQEQCO-723LfRVn-jw@comcast.com...
> >> The most generally highly-regarded studio monitors on
> >> the US market today are probably Mackie HR 824s.
> >
> > There would be a *huge* number of studio's with Genelec,
> > Dynaudio and JBL, that would disagree with that comment.
>
> Of course they would. But there are less of them. ;-)
Even if number sold is the only consideration, I doubt the Mackie's would be
number one, but it would be interesting to see sales figures.
I'd bet the Behringer Truths would be giving them a run for their money
these days, but neither is what *I'd* call "highly regarded".
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:L-6dndF-e8Bb8m3fRVn-ow@comcast.com...
> > Even if number sold is the only consideration, I doubt
> > the Mackie's would be number one, but it would be
> > interesting to see sales figures.
>
> I'm considering both reputation and number sold.
So you think Mackie's reputation is on par with Genelec, Dynaudio, JBL etc.
?
> > I'd bet the Behringer Truths would be giving them a run
> > for their money these days, but neither is what *I'd*
> > call "highly regarded".
>
> Unh Mr. T, please remind me again why your ideas about the
> audio production market in the US are supposedly so
> credible?
OK, you got me there. I don't live in the USA.
However you haven't provided any supporting data either, so it's all
conjecture.
"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:42f08079$0$22808$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
> news:L-6dndF-e8Bb8m3fRVn-ow@comcast.com...
>>> Even if number sold is the only consideration, I doubt
>>> the Mackie's would be number one, but it would be
>>> interesting to see sales figures.
>>
>> I'm considering both reputation and number sold.
>
> So you think Mackie's reputation is on par with Genelec,
> Dynaudio, JBL etc. ?
In the U.S. its pretty close. Obviously options will vary,
but HR824s have a lot of respect. They have also sold in
tremendous volume. Dynaudio and Genelec are boutique brands
over here. Tannoy is also in the game.
>>> I'd bet the Behringer Truths would be giving them a run
>>> for their money these days, but neither is what *I'd*
>>> call "highly regarded".
>> Unh Mr. T, please remind me again why your ideas about
>> the audio production market in the US are supposedly so
>> credible?
>
> OK, you got me there. I don't live in the USA.
> However you haven't provided any supporting data either,
> so it's all conjecture.
I don't have hard numbers but I have rough quantitative info
from a competitive marketing department. In most people's
mind the HR824 is the box to beat in the US market, either
in terms of price or quality.
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:2ZSdnVdERYjGm2zfRVn-1A@comcast.com...
>In most people's
> mind the HR824 is the box to beat in the US market, either
> in terms of price or quality.
I'm sorry to hear that. But the Yamaha's were once considered the box to
beat, so nothing much has changed it seems. :-)
"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:42f2d71e$0$19001$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote in message
> news:2ZSdnVdERYjGm2zfRVn-1A@comcast.com...
>> In most people's
>> mind the HR824 is the box to beat in the US market,
>> either in terms of price or quality.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. But the Yamaha's were once
> considered the box to beat, so nothing much has changed
> it seems. :-)
You obviously don't get the monitoring concept what the
little cheap Yammies represented, as compared to the
monitoring concept that the Mackies represent.
The Yamaha YS-10 was generally agreed-upon to have limited,
harsh sound. It was a limited harsh sound that could work
for tracking and mixing. Nobody in their right mind mastered
solely on YS-10s. Very few listened to music on YS-10s for
pleasure.
Mackie HR824s are basically pretty competent little
speakers, good extension, smooth, and generally not harsh at
all. There are people who even use them for mastering. A
little eq to undo the near field thing, and they can even
work in a listening room.
"Garrt" <le_kernel@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1123240931.928996.62440@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
>> In most people's mind the HR824 is the box to beat in
>> the US market, either in terms of price or quality.
>
>
> it's very rare that the box most commonly regarded as the
> best is actually the fittest box for the job.
Agreed. Given the mid-size, mid-price sitaution with the
HR824s, no way are they the best studio monitors around.
It's just that they are a sort of a happy medium, and also
pretty nice sounding speakers in their own right.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.