3DMark2000 benchmarks

Mine isn't that quick but here it is.
Celeron 566@884mhz
128mb pc100
Abit-BE6 II
Voodoo3 3000 16mb
Win98 2nd editon
Quantum10gb hdd 5600rpm

3dmark2000 16bit triple frame buffer PIII optimization
640x480 - 4128 3dmarks
800x600 - 3847 3dmarks
1024x768 - 3150 3dmarks

Going to be putting in a GEforce2MX in the morning so i'm curious to see how much it will pick up, and also my fcpga adaptor is crappy as hell. I can't even set the voltage higher than 1.75 so once I put in my ABIT slotket i'll have it running at 900+ mhz.
In Quake3,factory graphic setting when you install I get 83fps 640x480 ,76 800x600, 49 1024x768

In high quality i get, 640x480 77fps
800x600 63fps
1024x768 43

A7V with Duron 600 @ 950
GeForce 2GTS 64MB DDR
256 MB Crucial Ram
Maxtor HD ATA66
NVidia Drivers 6.49
DX 8
VIA 4.26
Windows Me
Default Benchmark ~6500

I think the differences between our scores are due to obviously the processor and all that extra cache. Also I think Windows Me is a little slower.

MY computer is REALLY messed up right now, as you can tell by the score:

Athlon 750 @ 1050
KA7-100
128MB SDRAM PC133
GeForce2 GTS 32MB DDR

Score (1024x768): 2913 HAHAHAHA LOL what a piece of crap

Oh well, I can't play any games right now , so I'm upgrading when the ABit or ASUS DDR motherboard's come out!

I wasn't quite satisfied with my results either.
SE440BX-2
PIII-800
512MB PC100
17 Gb IBM 7200 RPM
3dfx V5 5500 Agp
DX8
WIN 98SE

Final score 4183
I don't have the complete version, does your score come down since your not using the 2 image quality tests, and are you guys using the profesional version or the free one?

I am using the free one.

And BTW, your score is low due to the VooDoo card.
No offense, its just not as fast as the GeForce cards.

I used the FREE version. I'm not sure what you mean about the score coming down do to the image tests. I thought it ran through all 20 tests. Are there others that should be included?

Tbird 1.1Ghz / Asus A7V
256MB
ATI All-in-wonder Radeon, 32MB DDR
2x IBM 46.1GB drives in RAID 0 on Promise RAID controller
etc etc

3dmark, free download, default benchmark:
WinME
4807
downloading powerstrip, OC-ing my video RAM a bit by moving the slider 0.5 cm to the right from 166MHZ to 182MHZ
5250
(I never believed OCing *could* be so easy and painless 

Win2k
4500 or so (don't remember exactly)

performs worse in Win2k, I guess because it wasn't tuned for gaming...

score is low for what my system can do, but that's because of video card - I wanted more features than pure raw performance
(people from same company with same config but GF2 Ultra got 9320 on their scores!   :smile:

Kodiak,
What are you using to OC your video card?
Powerstrip?
Where did you get it and can it be used with GeForce Cards?

There are two more tests in the complete version. They are image quality tests.

bubba:
yes and yes... just search on Yahoo for PowerStrip  
its mirrored everywhere... quick search finds:

http://www.tweakfiles.com/video/powerstrip.html

G'luck 

powerstrip makes it easy to OC it... but its up to you to make sure you cool it well etc...

I thought Geforce can be overclocked just by going into its software/driver settings?

it can with the newer drivers

Companies that = cancer
ati creative lexmark micro$oft mitsumi rambu$ via

A-Open AK73PRO
T-Bird 800 @ 1000
Asus GF2-GTS 32mg

3Dmark = 8300

Asus A7V w/ 1005a bios
Tbird 700@945 (9x105)
128meg PC100 CAS2 @ 133 Cas3
Asus V7700 Deluxe w/ det.6.31 core/mem 205/390

3dMark 640x480 16bit = 8390

"I yam what I yam!"

whew, I only get around 4200 in 640 x 480 and 3300 with default settings.
FIC AZ11
mushkin rev2 256mb
Diamond Viper 770 Ultra (remember when Diamond was good
IBM Deskstar 45GB 7200 (shouldn't matter)
1 GHz T-Bird
Win2K Pro SP1
DX8a
Detonator 6.50 (tried 7.17 but, it screws up in ACAD)

Now I don't have much in the settings dept on this board and I haven't even tried to OC besides the RAM settings at CAS2 which I don't believe is considered OC'n especially since it's Mushkin RAM. I was wondering how this compared to unOC'd systems.

<font color=white> This new forum still sucks </font color=white>

Iwas trying to compare my performance to other computers,but on Mad Onion's website it dosen't give you all the system specs or if it is overclocked etc.So i really have no real way to fully compare.all posts would be appreciated.
thanks in advance rick

asus P3V4x
P3 550e@814 1.75v 148fsb
Annihilator 2 32mb 235/370
128mb micron pc133 cas3 at 148fsb
10 gig Western Digital 7200 rpm udma66
Vortex 2
52x cdrom
Soho nic
Best Data 56k modem
floppy

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare.shtml?1310492
6951 3D MARKS
1024x768 16bit

i had posted this under o/c 3dchips then i found it here,so i was lazy and did a copy paste.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Rick_Criswell on 02/26/01 11:36 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Hey Flyboy, we can't help unless you tell the resolution you used, it makes a HUGE diff!

I'm assuming default bench?

Screw the risks! -Street
-AMD 1470Mhz-Abit KT7A-Raid-256Mushrev3-Fop38

I have both installed, and have been troubled with the rather "unstable" condition of Win2K. Athlon 1ghz/Asus A7V/512/ultradma100 working. I used the 3dmark2000 to do a system check and noticed that in Win2K it runs at the 5000 to 5100 and WinME runs at 7100 to 7300. I figure this is something to do with the VIAAGP.sys file. I need help on how to get Win2k stable <7 lock-ups a day is quite normal>.And maybe even get the AGP problems fixed up.
Any information would be greatly welcomed. It's a Geforce2 pro vid card


Menatour