I pick up a nice one of these last weekend.
Works great.
But all I'm able to learn about it is the age (c. 1979)
and output (about 65w/ch).
Is there anything else of interest about these to make them special?
(Other than it being a really nice sounding amp.)
<dplotusnotes@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123586307.194569.191580@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I pick up a nice one of these last weekend.
> Works great.
> But all I'm able to learn about it is the age (c. 1979)
> and output (about 65w/ch).
> Is there anything else of interest about these to make them special?
> (Other than it being a really nice sounding amp.)
>
> TIA,
>
> Collin
> KC8TKA
>
The A-7 was one product which really helped put Onkyo on the map. They had a
line of pretty nice but under powered receivers - the TX-440, TX-560, etc.
Then came the breakthrough products, the TX-4500 which to my knowledge was
the first Quartz-Locked analog tuning receiver, then the A-7 integrated amp,
of which we sold as many as we could get and rightly thought it was better
than most of the competition. Then followed it's big brother the A-10, then
the smaller A-5. All were very reliable and well built, and good value for
the money at the time. Sound-quality wise, they didn't quite match up to
good separate preamp/power amp combinations.
>Sound-quality wise, they didn't quite match up to
>good separate preamp/power amp combinations.
Many don't.
But for general listening it's pretty decent.
My son's NAD and old Sansui don't sound quite as nice.
The NAD has good low end, but not as much depth.
The Sansui has the depth but not as much low end.
They're also both slightly lower-powered.
(NAD @ 35w/ch & Sansui @ 50w/ch vs A-7 @ 65w/ch)
Got it @ a garage sale for $10. Took a chance. It was worth it.
What do they sell for used?
<dplotusnotes@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123587846.724534.97740@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks for the info.
>
>>Sound-quality wise, they didn't quite match up to
>>good separate preamp/power amp combinations.
>
> Many don't.
> But for general listening it's pretty decent.
> My son's NAD and old Sansui don't sound quite as nice.
> The NAD has good low end, but not as much depth.
> The Sansui has the depth but not as much low end.
> They're also both slightly lower-powered.
> (NAD @ 35w/ch & Sansui @ 50w/ch vs A-7 @ 65w/ch)
>
> Got it @ a garage sale for $10. Took a chance. It was worth it.
> What do they sell for used?
>
> TIA,
>
> Collin
>
Used value is extremely variable. Ebay is a good resource to see what things
can get in the real world. You got a deal - no question about that! Perhaps
about 75.00 to 100.00 depending on condition, whether the controls have been
recently cleaned, etc.
I searched da 'bay the other day. There's not been one for a while.
Last one I saw on a google ng search was advertized, iirc, 1999 for
about $100.
Apparently not many of 'em left.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.