If you know anything about electrical circuits RAID can be related to parallel and series circuits a security array is like a parallel circuit and a performance array is like a series circuit, if you don't know anything at all about electrical circuits, this means absolutely nothing to you. RAID stands for Redundent Array of Independent Disks, for RAID to be truly optimized you should run Identical hardrives, same speed, same size capacity, same ATA and DMA ratings. RAID can be run in security mode, which means for example you have two 20GB ATA100 UltraDMA 7200 RPM hardrives running in security mode, the two drives are recognized by the computer as one 20GB hardrive, with one drive being a mirror image of the other, and an exact duplicate, the advantage being that if one hardrive fails you don't loose your whole system, and you can still boot up from the good hardrive, and you have the ability to replace the bad drive and reconstruct your system automatically through the rebuild array function, another advantage to the security array I really like, and the main reason I'm running a security array myself is, when you write to the hardrives they only write at their individual set speeds but when you Read from the drives its doubled, which really shows up in performance when you're playing a PC intense video game with a screen full of enemys where you may notice some slowing down of the game and increased chatter coming from your hardrive since I've been running a security array the game slowing is gone. A performance array gives you faster performance by combining the two drives which your computer would recognize a combined size of 40GB and would stripe{or share} the information between the two drives one drive having half the data, and the other drive has the other half of the data, Performance array writes at twice the speed and reads at twice the speed, but if it goes down you loose everything. It is possible to run dual arrays which would be the way to go if you wanted to invest that much money in hardrives, running a security and performance array together, if the performance array went down you'd still have an operational system. Well I hope this has given you some kind of understanding about RAID, without getting really deep into the subject but trying to explain it in everyday talk. Have a nice day.
Thanks for a well done explaination. I now understand the concept and will study up on it. I most certainly have the cases (tall towers). I agree there are advantages to each method.
Every working computer must be improved .... or replaced ...
If you look closely, RAID is everywhere. You can see the same idea happening in DDR. Or in multiprocessing. Also the voodoo2 had two cards working in SLI, which was kind of like RAID. Now there is a new wireless networking technology developed by Intel that uses multiple bands to transmit, kind of like RAID for wireless LAN.
It's also no secret, that all of the supercomputers in the world are only fast because they have like 50 gazillion processors all working together at once.
This little cathode light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine!
------------------
A performance array gives you faster performance by combining the two drives which your computer would recognize a combined size of 40GB and would stripe{or share} the information between the two drives one drive having half the data, and the other drive has the other half of the data, Performance array writes at twice the speed and reads at twice the speed
------------
HMMMMMMMMM
Can I performance RAID a pair of fast 52X CDROMS that run my game? Having identical CDROMS on each ... Speed up the CDROM reading would certainly decrease those annoying pauses in my PINBALL game as the graphics are changed.
Every working computer must be improved .... or replaced ...
Ah, you are catching on here! There used to be 'RAID for CD-ROMs' but it was discontinued just about a year ago. A Japanese company, Kenwood, was making CD-ROM drives that used 7 lasers simultaneously to read the same disc multiple times and speed everything up (on average about 3-5 times faster than an off-the-sheld "40x max drive" ). I in fact own one myself. The main problem was that many users experienced problems with them, so they were discontinued.
Here's a link to see discussion about this now discontinued drive...
It's unfortunate, but after this forlorn fiasco, Kenwood decided to completely stop making CD-ROMs and stick to making speakers and multimedia/home theater stuff. In that same link above someone mentions that a new company is now working on another 'RAID for CD-ROM' kind of setup. You can't use two drives, just a single drive that has the multiread capability, which no CD-ROM on the market today has ever since Kenwood stopped making them. As for annoying pauses, that is actually because of your CD-ROM spin-down time. You can download a software program to increase the time your CD-ROM will continue to spin when it's not being asked for data. The only reasons why you would want to keep spin-down times short is because of too much noise and keeping your CD-ROM heat levels low. I'm not sure who makes this program, maybe Creative, but do an internet search, search these forums, and ask in other forums too.
This little cathode light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine!
<A HREF="http://www.raid.com/04_00.html" target="_new">Get to know RAID & Benchmarking Tools</A>
Bryan
<font color=red><Begin Signature></font color=red>
_____________________________
<A HREF="http://www.btvillarin.com" target="_new">btvillarin.com</A>
My personal website, chock full of tips and other computer stuff. No ads, banners, or catches. It's currently based on Windows XP, but Windows 2000 stuff to come.
<font color=green><A HREF="http://www.btvillarin.com/staff/bryan_villarin.html" target="_new">My System Rig</A> - can anyone give it a name? I haven't yet, and I don't have any ideas</font color=green>
<i>I'm back from Hawaii, so sorry if I'm a bit slow...</i>
Just some RAID recommendations (I also posted this today in the HD section. Check the details there)
1) Dont buy the Seagate Barracude ATA IV for use in RAID 0 (bad performance)
2) If your mobo has embedded promise RAID controller verify that it is NOT the LITE version (limited config possibilities)
<A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=50639#50639" target="_new">Link to HammerBot's post</A>
Bryan
<font color=red><Signature></font color=red>
<b><A HREF="http://www.btvillarin.com" target="_new">btvillarin.com</A></b>
My personal website, chock full of tips and other computer stuff. No ads, banners, or catches. It's currently based on Windows XP, but Windows 2000 stuff to come.
<b><A HREF="http://www.btvillarin.com/staff/bryan_villarin.html" target="_new">My System Rig</A></b>
<font color=red></Signature></font color=red>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.