OOOOPS! We invaded the wrong country?

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Oooops, you invaded the wrong newsgroup. This one's for pro audio
discussion. Didn't we cover that about 792 times in the last month?

- Logan

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Pete Dimsman wrote:
> <http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/19/bush.iran/index.html>
>
>
> Bush: U.S. probes possible Iran links to 9/11.
> Tehran government hiding Al Qaeda members, president says
>
> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Iran is harboring members of al Qaeda, and the
> United States is investigating whether the Iranian government had a
> role in the September 11, 2001, attacks, President Bush said Monday.

Hey, the spelling was close. And they wear funny hats too. Near enough.


geoff

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Pete Dimsman <pd@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<2m3246Fi3af0U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> <http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/19/bush.iran/index.html>
>
>
> Bush: U.S. probes possible Iran links to 9/11.
> Tehran government hiding Al Qaeda members, president says
>
> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Iran is harboring members of al Qaeda, and the
> United States is investigating whether the Iranian government had a role
> in the September 11, 2001, attacks, President Bush said Monday.

Shouldn't we change the subject to "OOOOPS! We invaded the wrong _newsgroup_!"

;-)

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

ThePaulThomas wrote:
> Pete Dimsman <pd@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:<2m3246Fi3af0U1@uni-berlin.de>...
>> <http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/19/bush.iran/index.html>
>>
>>
>> Bush: U.S. probes possible Iran links to 9/11.
>> Tehran government hiding Al Qaeda members, president says
>>
>> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Iran is harboring members of al Qaeda, and the
>> United States is investigating whether the Iranian government had a
>> role in the September 11, 2001, attacks, President Bush said Monday.
>
> Shouldn't we change the subject to "OOOOPS! We invaded the wrong
> _newsgroup_!"


No, "Ooops We Invaded The Wrong Thread".

geoff

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <MPG.1b672e70a884f64898978b@newshost>,
Michael <ra3035@NOTfreescale.com> wrote:

> In article <g.p.gleason-2E9EEB.14311720072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
> g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net says...
> > I said:
> > > My modified PZMs have a rising high frequency all the way out to
> > > about 24KHz! Their specified top end is 18KHz. I wonder how that
> > > happened? It could even be higher; my measurement system hits
> > > Nyquist limits at 24KHz. <---(Obligatory audio content)
> > > ---Michael (of APP)...
> >
> > and here we have another off topic post arguing about what is or isn't
> > off topic
> > you guys are just 2 funny
> > G
>
> Hmm. Maybe you should read the whole post before inserting foot...
> Normally you bring a decent audio discussion in here. What's with
> all the gaff here lately?
> ---Michael (of APP)...

tthe essence of your post was off topic
adding a unrelated bit of pointless audio does not make it on topic
if you wanted to be on topic you could have left off all the other stuff
except your pzm issue
G

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"George" <g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:g.p.gleason-C3A351.16403720072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net

>>> Normally you bring a decent audio discussion in here. What's with
>>> all the gaff here lately?

Hysteria, pure and simple.

> The seriousness of the crimes GW Bush is committing takes precedence
> over audio at this time

But George, your bellyaching about something that only you can change for
you, and then not until 11/2/2004, is a waste of all of our time, yourself
included.

> this is no time for banter about directional esoteric cables

Then go hit the streets or the election committee office of your choice,
George.

> we are discussing the very survival of freedom and the damage GW is doing
to it

No George, you're merely obsessing and spinning your wheels. You're imposing
your will on people who don't agree with your priorities, just like you
accuse others of doing.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"George" <g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:g.p.gleason-10569F.17000020072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net

>> No George, you're merely obsessing and spinning your wheels. You're
>> imposing your will on people who don't agree with your priorities,
>> just like you accuse others of doing.

> no I am forcing people to examine thier core beliefs,

You're delusional, George. All you're doing is provoke a lot of posturing.

All you're doing is provoking a lot of OT posting.

>I don't care what they post here, the constant pointing out of the crimes
against
> freedom committed by this administration will cause a few to pause and
> reconsider pulling the lever for GW at the election

You're delusional, George. Your arguing is so narrow and pointless that it
is easy to dismiss.

> I hope I can influence them consider voting for thier own self
> intrests beacuse they are getting both side of the situation

All they're getting George is a good laugh out of your illiterate, poorly
thought-out spew.

> we have a caprious adminstration who is trying desperatly to rewrite
> the constitution to make this a police state(IMO)
> and what make you think I am not active locally?

You have way too much time to spend here, George to have much of a life
locally. OTOH George, perhaps the locals can see you for what you are, and
try to limit your activities on their behalf.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:00:24 -0500, Pete Dimsman <pd@nospam.com>
wrote:

>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Iran is harboring members of al Qaeda, and the
>United States is investigating whether the Iranian government had a role
>in the September 11, 2001, attacks, President Bush said Monday.

Well, it's been next on the list to invade (aka liberate) for while
hasn't it?

Mark
"In this business egos can be wonderful, but they also can be a curse."
Michael Wagener

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:08:14 -0400, Mark Plancke
<Mark@SoundtechRecording.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:00:24 -0500, Pete Dimsman <pd@nospam.com>
>wrote:
>
>>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Iran is harboring members of al Qaeda, and the
>>United States is investigating whether the Iranian government had a role
>>in the September 11, 2001, attacks, President Bush said Monday.
>
>Well, it's been next on the list to invade (aka liberate) for while
>hasn't it?

They better be careful not to wreck any of Halliburton's stuff when
they go in:

-------------------------------------------------------------

CHENEY ATTACKED FIGHT AGAINST TERROR WHILE ABROAD

On the same day that President Bush announced plans to investigate
Iran for ties to terrorism,[1] Halliburton acknowledged that "a U.S.
grand jury issued a subpoena to the company seeking information about
its Cayman Islands unit's work in Iran,[2] where it is illegal for
U.S. companies to operate." Earlier this year, CBS News reported that
Vice President Dick Cheney was CEO of the company "during which time
Halliburton Products and Services set up shop in Iran."[3] In fact,
Cheney was so adamant about doing business with terrorist nations like
Iran, he even went abroad to publicly attack American foreign policy
after meeting with top officials from a foreign government.

Despite economic sanctions on Iran because of its ties to terrorists,
Cheney openly bragged about Halliburton's business dealings there
during the 2000 campaign.[4] Cheney argued that it was ethical for
Halliburton to use "independent foreign subsidiaries" that exist in
tax shelter countries like the Cayman Islands to skirt U.S. law. He
also went abroad to attack American policy: According to the Malaysian
News Agency, Cheney publicly attacked U.S. sanctions on terrorist
countries after a meeting with top Malaysian government officials in
Kuala Lampur.[5]

During the 2000 campaign, Cheney also claimed that, as Halliburton
CEO, "I had a firm policy that we wouldn't do anything in Iraq,[6]
even arrangements that were supposedly legal." Yet, earlier this year,
The New Yorker reported "during Cheney's tenure[7] at Halliburton the
company did business" in Iraq as well. The Washington Post reported
that despite strict economic sanctions, Halliburton did up to $73
million in business[8] with Iraq while Cheney was heading the company.


Sources:
1. "Bush: U.S. probes possible Iran links to 9/11," CNN.com, 7/19/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46889.
2. "Halliburton Subpoenaed Over Unit's Iran Work ," Reuters, 7/19/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46890.
3. "Doing Business With The Enemy," 60 Minutes, 1/25/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46891.
4. "Halliburton Iraq ties more than Cheney said," NewsMax.com,
6/25/01, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46892 .
5. Malaysian News Agency, 4/20/98
6. "Contract Sport,"The New Yorker, 2/16/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46893.
7. Ibid, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46893.
8. "Halliburton's Iraq Deals Greater Than Cheney Has
Said,"TruthOut.org, 6/23/01,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2162433&l=46894.





Visit www.Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration distortion.
»

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Mark Plancke wrote:

> Well, it's been next on the list to invade (aka liberate) for while
> hasn't it?


Next year?

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On 2004-07-20, Arny Krueger <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote:

> Notice George that you just claimed that:
>
> "I am forcing people to examine thier core beliefs"
>
> IOW George, you are bragging about your use of force on people. You
> are bragging that you are able to make them do something that is
> against their will. You are invading their privacy and their
> disrupting theircontrol over their own minds.

Oh yeah, I know what you're talking about. There's a word for it
when it's done by adults to minors : education.

> What does all this forcable activity make you, George?

Er... a dad ?

--
André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
Sauvez un phoque, mangez un eskimo.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <Qu6dnUITaOeDB2DdRVn-rg@comcast.com>,
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote:

> "George" <g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:g.p.gleason-04E9DA.17394220072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net
>
> > as always Arny when you are up against the wall you attack the
> > spelling and grammer,
>
> No George, I'm just trying to encourage you to rexamine your inner core
> beliefs.
>
> Notice George that you just claimed that:
>
> "I am forcing people to examine thier core beliefs"
>
> IOW George, you are bragging about your use of force on people. You are
> bragging that you are able to make them do something that is against their
> will. You are invading their privacy and their disrupting theircontrol over
> their own minds.
>
> What does all this forcable activity make you, George?
>
>
>
>
I dunno?
not very good at selecting adjectives?
g

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

reddred wrote:

> > Next year?
>
> I don't think they can do it before then. Not only that, they'd be breaking
> the 'one lie to get us into a war per president' rule, which has been in
> place since JFK at least.


Maybe it's been modified to "per term".

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:38:59 -0400, "reddred"
<opaloka@REMOVECAPSyahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"Don Cooper" <dcooper28800@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:40FDC62A.1AF0CB39@comcast.net...
>>
>>
>> Mark Plancke wrote:
>>
>> > Well, it's been next on the list to invade (aka liberate) for while
>> > hasn't it?
>>
>>
>> Next year?
>
>I don't think they can do it before then. Not only that, they'd be breaking
>the 'one lie to get us into a war per president' rule, which has been in
>place since JFK at least.

They can't do it unless they restart the draft.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"George" <g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:g.p.gleason-437E63.23221820072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net
> In article <Qu6dnUITaOeDB2DdRVn-rg@comcast.com>,
> "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
>> "George" <g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> news:g.p.gleason-04E9DA.17394220072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net
>>
>>> as always Arny when you are up against the wall you attack the
>>> spelling and grammer,
>>
>> No George, I'm just trying to encourage you to rexamine your inner
>> core beliefs.
>>
>> Notice George that you just claimed that:

>> "I am forcing people to examine thier core beliefs"

>> IOW George, you are bragging about your use of force on people. You
>> are bragging that you are able to make them do something that is
>> against their will. You are invading their privacy and their
>> disrupting theircontrol over their own minds.

>> What does all this forcable activity make you, George?

> I dunno? not very good at selecting adjectives?

Come on George, if you can't say what you mean, why should we pay a moment's
attention to *anything* you write? If you are going to set yourself up as
some kind of leader or authority, at least try to pretend that you can play
the role.

I think your statement was very telling. In fact George you're playing the
role of a disruptive child around here. If you did it at a in-person meeting
of adults, you'd be shunned.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

playon wrote:

> They can't do it unless they restart the draft.


I think Will would look darn good in a uniform.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Randall Shawver wrote:

> I would gladly suit up to oppose those who chant death to America
> and want the destruction of us, Israel and democracy altogether.
> You wouldnt?


Let's roll!

USA! USA! USA!

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

>
> I think your statement was very telling. In fact George you're playing the
> role of a disruptive child around here. If you did it at a in-person meeting
> of adults, you'd be shunned.

you say all this as if you have a point or that your rantings have any
authority
LOL
Come see me at AES I will give you twice this in person

g
>
>

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <6etsf0dfn04jd5hf2n0h4dhqr9lvvrregt@4ax.com>,
Pietro <progettoecommerce@virgilioPUNTO.it> wrote:

> >The seriousness of the crimes GW Bush is committing takes precedence
> >over audio at this time
>
> This is one of the first concepts that fascism wanted to impose to us
> in Italy.. "things that takes precedence".. a really awful matter...
> There are many and many newsgroups for a thread like your and you want
> to impose us to discuss it..
> Now I have a question: WHO decide what "takes precedence"? You? the
> King? Bush? Saddam?
> I'll freely won't be stop speackin' hi-fi/lo-fi matters, and I hope
> everybody will do the same.
> I really can't easily immagine someone interested in gettin' a good
> banjo sound at war.. while I could do it for someone who likes to
> impose its questions.
>
> Regards.
>
> P.S.: sorry for my English..
> Ciao,
> Pietro

I am saying it is taking precedence in my personal affairs, not that
anyone else needs to or even should care
George

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <iOGdnZ3DXfwHOGPdRVn-uQ@comcast.com>,
"Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote:

> "George" <g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:g.p.gleason-5CBB05.12553721072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net
>
> >> I think your statement was very telling. In fact George you're
> >> playing the role of a disruptive child around here. If you did it at
> >> a in-person meeting of adults, you'd be shunned.
>
> > you say all this as if you have a point or that your rantings have any
> authority
>
> Tell us George about the last time upi showed up at a local AES chapter
> meeting and hijacked it for political debate.
>
> > Come see me at AES I will give you twice this in person
>
> OK, George tell about the last time upi showed up at a national AES
> meeting and hijacked it for political debate.
>
> There are over 20,000 Usenet groups, at least 1000 or more deal with social
> issues. Apparently the cosmic meaning of this has escaped you, George.

I perfer to discuss this with names I know, if fact Ihave met face to
face wih many of those I am in disscusion with here
so you see arny I am not going to the other groups beacuse I know and
have met many of those I am talking to here , they are at least allied
in the feild I work in, know the people I know and thier opinions are
the ones I am intrested in
other wise I might as well set up a soap box at the bus stop and yell
into the wind
G
>
>

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <g.p.gleason-C3A351.16403720072004@netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
g.p.gleason@worldnet.att.net says...
>
> > > Normally you bring a decent audio discussion in here. What's with
> > > all the gaff here lately?
> > > ---Michael (of APP)...
> >
> The seriousness of the crimes GW Bush is committing takes precedence
> over audio at this time
> this is no time for banter about directional esoteric cables
> we are discussing the very survival of freedom and the damage GW is
> doing to it

You *do* realize that this is not a USA-only group, right?
Much of the world has no interest in this, and certainly not
in this forum. We're big, but we're not the whole world.
---Michael (of APP)...

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

<<> If you did it at a in-person meeting
> of adults, you'd be shunned.


Oh no! Not the shunning! Anything but the shunning!>>


How about THE COMFY CHAIR!
elaterium@aol.com (Mark Steven Brooks/Elaterium Music)

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Mark Steven Brooks wrote:

> How about THE COMFY CHAIR!


Not THE COMFY CHAIR!

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

George wrote:

> Come see me at AES I will give you twice this in person


I'd have a $10 muffin with ya, George.