i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
piano drums bass
mainly concerned with piano for now. there will be alot of dynamic range so
i'm wondering what limiter will be able to handle a ton of signal without
breaking up.
leaning toward 1176's. universal audio reissue unless someone has a better
idea.
also wondering if limiting is necessary at all while recording to digital
format since the noise floor is alot lower and i could just lower the
overall level being recorded.
i've used medium quality limiters in the past that would always break up
when hit with alot of level. even demeter's would break up, not sure if
these are considered high quality
there will be moments of transient peaks and i would like as natural a sound
as possible without any distortions and without any squashing compressor
sound.
this is the stupid part of the question
if the signal breaks up at the board on a transient peak will a limiter be
able to remove the distorted part of this or is it already too late.
Anon wrote
>
>if the signal breaks up at the board on a transient peak will a limiter be
>able to remove the distorted part of this or is it already too late.
>
If the limiter is after the board (in the signal chain) then yes, it is to
late. But if before then it will likely do it's thing and help. All and all you
need to know the dynamics of the band, mic placement and all of what your going
to record to foresee (the emanate attack on the death star) what will be going
to your recording medium.
I only can speculate so maybe another in the group will chime in and give you
some more info.
In article <9BFPc.45951$oW6.9765445@twister.nyc.rr.com> anonymousm@nyc.rr.com writes:
> i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
> piano drums bass
>
> mainly concerned with piano for now. there will be alot of dynamic range so
> i'm wondering what limiter will be able to handle a ton of signal without
> breaking up.
Any limiter, as long as you don't set the threshold too low. In this
application, a limiter should protect you, not shape the sound.
> also wondering if limiting is necessary at all while recording to digital
> format since the noise floor is alot lower and i could just lower the
> overall level being recorded.
Good. No, a limiter is not necessary if you set the record level so
that you can accommodate the full dynamic range of the performance.
This is not a problem with modern 24-bit systems, but you can't be
stupid about it. You have to ask the piano player (or the group) to
play as loud as they would play to a full house on an energitic piece,
and set the record level so that peaks are no higher than about
-6 dBFS. That will give them some headroom for when they DO play
louder (and they will). You also have to restrain yourself and not
turn up the gain when they play a quiet piece. You'll only amplify the
background noise on your recording. Leave that for the production
where you can make more intelligent decisions. It's OK for one piece
on a CD to be quieter than another one. That's what the band played,
isn't it?
> if the signal breaks up at the board on a transient peak will a limiter be
> able to remove the distorted part of this or is it already too late.
Nope, it's too late. That's why you set levels properly - so this
won't happen.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
anon <anonymousm@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
>piano drums bass
>
>mainly concerned with piano for now. there will be alot of dynamic range so
>i'm wondering what limiter will be able to handle a ton of signal without
>breaking up.
>leaning toward 1176's. universal audio reissue unless someone has a better
>idea.
>
>also wondering if limiting is necessary at all while recording to digital
>format since the noise floor is alot lower and i could just lower the
>overall level being recorded.
Do you want limiting for the sound, or do you want limiting to prevent overs?
If your goal is to prevent overs, by all means the smart thing to do is to
just lower the levels.
Prism makes some "safety limiter" barrel gadgets that will help you prevent
overs if you absolutely _have_ to do that, but it is really superfluous in
the digital world where we have outrageous dynamic range.
>i've used medium quality limiters in the past that would always break up
>when hit with alot of level. even demeter's would break up, not sure if
>these are considered high quality
So, don't do that! Turn the levels down.
>if the signal breaks up at the board on a transient peak will a limiter be
>able to remove the distorted part of this or is it already too late.
It is too late. Turn your levels down. If you want limiting to get a
particular sound, there's no reaosn you can't do it after the fact, though
it won't do anything to prevent clipping earlier in the chain.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Are you mixing direct to two-track, or are you recording multitrack and then
mixing down? If the latter, just record to a good 24-bit system and record
at a low level. Mike suggested setting things so that the hottest notes
during the run-through never go above -6dBFS; I'd go a little further and
make that -10dBFS. With a 24-bit system, it doesn't make any difference.
If you're going direct to two-track, then an 1176 on the piano mike might be
a reasonable choice, if you feel you need compression/limiting of the piano.
Personally, I'd rather go without it.
And yes, as everyone else said, if the clip light has lit, you can't fix it.
ok thanks for all the advice so far. this is all live to two track not
multitracked
i'm not interested in coloring the sound at all, just interested in
preventing peak distortions. so i take it that it in the past the issue was
s/n ratio with tape machines and now with digital formats it is not so
important.
i wasn't aware that you could put the limiter before the preamp. is this
common?
i think some preamps don't sound as good when not driven hard or am i off on
this
so it looks like i don't really need limiting then, just good pre's that
will be able to handle alot of signal, and setting my level a bit lower to
accomodate peak distortions
"anon" <anonymousm@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:QHPPc.62773$4h7.9688730@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> ok thanks for all the advice so far. this is all live to two track not
> multitracked
>
> i'm not interested in coloring the sound at all, just interested in
> preventing peak distortions. so i take it that it in the past the issue
was
> s/n ratio with tape machines and now with digital formats it is not so
> important.
>
> i wasn't aware that you could put the limiter before the preamp. is this
> common?
No; typically the limiter goes after the preamp or into an insert jack in
the preamp/mixer.
> i think some preamps don't sound as good when not driven hard or am i off
on
> this
Usually they sound better when not driven hard; driving them hard normally
generates more distortion.
> so it looks like i don't really need limiting then, just good pre's that
> will be able to handle alot of signal, and setting my level a bit lower to
> accomodate peak distortions
> i wasn't aware that you could put the limiter before the preamp. is this
> common?
Paul wrote
No; typically the limiter goes after the preamp or into an insert jack in
the preamp/mixer.
That's what I ment, in the insert. Limiters (like the really nice tubes) are
better used as a main L/R thing. So you need to concentrate more on your mic
placement and knowing what to expect than relying on Ab Fab gear to fix (so to
speak) something that that can be prevented to start with.
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:45:12 GMT, "Paul Stamler"
<pstamlerhell@pobox.com> wrote:
>> i think some preamps don't sound as good when not driven hard or am i off
>on
>> this
>
>Usually they sound better when not driven hard; driving them hard normally
>generates more distortion.
But preamps that boast a "sound" often do it by adding distortion.
This may not kick in unless the preamp's being driven hard.
There's a whole modern philosophy of recording based on driving
everything up to its limit and rounding off the top with compression.
If that's the result you want......
> > i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
> > piano drums bass
> no need for limiters there
True enough, there shouldn't be... but transients are fleeting things.
I'd be inclined to put an Aphex Dominator in the chain, set just below
machine clipping to cover my backside against a digital overshoot.
If everything goes as expected, the unit would never see action, but
it would also provide some assurance that a take isn't damaged by
something unexpected.
"anon" <anonymousm@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:9BFPc.45951$oW6.9765445@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
> piano drums bass
I think you'ld be better off by recording at lower levels, but I'm not
opposed to a highly transparent limiter in the path for safety reasons.
> mainly concerned with piano for now. there will be alot of dynamic range so
> i'm wondering what limiter will be able to handle a ton of signal without
> breaking up.
Piano is the last thing you should be worried about... at least IMHO. Get
a decent check with the player letting it all hang out, dynamically speaking,
and then back off another couple of dB. Start this process at the input
gain pots, not at the outputs of the desk or the tape machine.
> leaning toward 1176's. universal audio reissue unless someone has a better
> idea.
You're looking at the limiting function of a compressor. If you are recording
direct to 2-track stereo, you could use something like an Aphex Dominator
model 720... easily found on e-Bay in the area of under $400. ($1299 new).
Do *not* deliberately use it to limit your signal... rather use it as a safety net
for the settings which you have already reduced to safe levels.
> also wondering if limiting is necessary at all while recording to digital
> format since the noise floor is alot lower and i could just lower the
> overall level being recorded.
No, it is not. This is the *best* answer and it will save you lots of heartache
from money spent and possibly nasty results from the effects of compression
and limiting. Reducing gain is not a problem even with a lowly 16 bits, but this
reduction should begin at the console or mic pre inputs.
> i've used medium quality limiters in the past that would always break up
> when hit with alot of level. even demeter's would break up, not sure if
> these are considered high quality
>
> there will be moments of transient peaks and i would like as natural a sound
> as possible without any distortions and without any squashing compressor
> sound.
Lower the mic input and mixer output levels to compensate for the transients
as best as possible, then use a transparent limiter set to come into play only
if the combined signals of the group might produce a transient that could still
exceed full scale or tape saturation.
> this is the stupid part of the question
>
> if the signal breaks up at the board on a transient peak will a limiter be
> able to remove the distorted part of this or is it already too late.
If the signal breaks up at the board, your gain structure is not correctly set
or there is a malfunction in the input gain or output stage. Nothing can
undo that sort of thing.
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 02:20:32 GMT, David Morgan (MAMS)
<mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com> wrote:
>
> "Sugarite" <nobody@home.com> wrote in message...
>
>> > i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
>> > piano drums bass
>
>> no need for limiters there
>
While we're on the thread, how about a durable, inexpensive, non-pumpy
unit for road rack live sound use?
Yes, I realize that those are not really compatible options.
However, I'm just a smidgeon hesitant to drag a $3000 tube unit out to a
club date. Maybe it's just me...
U-CDK_CHARLES\\Charles <cdkrug@aol.com> wrote:
>
>While we're on the thread, how about a durable, inexpensive, non-pumpy
>unit for road rack live sound use?
>
>Yes, I realize that those are not really compatible options.
The old MXR ones still turn up cheaply and they are great for the
application. Symetrix also made a couple good cheap limiters that
were roadable. The MXR is much more colored, but it's colored in a
way that is fun on guitar.
I have a thing called an "Audion Limiter" that was made in Russia and
cost me about $50 a decade ago and it's not half bad, actually.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
"U-CDK_CHARLES\Charles" <"Charles Krug"@cdksystems.com> wrote in message news:22OQc.56$Iv.46@trndny03...
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 02:20:32 GMT, David Morgan (MAMS)
> <mams@NOSPAm-a-m-s.com> wrote:
> >
> > "Sugarite" <nobody@home.com> wrote in message...
> >
> >> > i'm looking for a good pair of limiters to be used in live jazz recording,
> >> > piano drums bass
> >
> >> no need for limiters there
> >
>
> While we're on the thread, how about a durable, inexpensive, non-pumpy
> unit for road rack live sound use?
>
> Yes, I realize that those are not really compatible options.
Why not? I will always maintain that the only difference between live sound
and studio sound is that in the studio one has a controlled environment in
which to work - - and in a live situation, one must learn to control the
environment he is working in. The gear can essentially be exactly the same.
> However, I'm just a smidgeon hesitant to drag a $3000 tube unit out to a
> club date. Maybe it's just me...
I have 3 Aphex Compellor 320 (compressor/leveller) and 3 Aphex Dominator
720 (multiband peak limiter). Essentially, they are sister pieces... with the
compressor/leveller coming first and the multiband peak limiter following
to catch the transient overshoots. These puppies have been staples in
the broadcast arena for some time and are used by many as their 2-buss
compression and limiting devices in the studio. They retail for $1299 each,
but can be found on e-Bay for well under $400 each. Add a trip to Aphex
for a total refurbish on each item and you might be out another $150.
That's under a grand for two great pieces that will do, quite transparently,
what you seem to need done. That would by my recommendation for
the best bang for the buck in a live situation. Not only do I use these in
the signal path to my 2-track recording rig, but I recommend and install
them in clubs as program levellers and speaker protection devices.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.