Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
lots of m's and n's!
but seriously, i was wondering how Neumann mics (KM-84, U87, TLM-103
etc) tend to pair up with the Millennia preamp. i really like Neumann
mics, and i've heard and observed great results with the Millennia
HV-3. but i don't have enough experience to know if the Neumanns
"like" the Millennia in the same way that a U87 likes being mated with
a 1073.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
"xy" <genericaudioperson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c38b64b.0408022159.114fadf0@posting.google.com...
> lots of m's and n's!
>
> but seriously, i was wondering how Neumann mics (KM-84, U87, TLM-103
> etc) tend to pair up with the Millennia preamp. i really like Neumann
> mics, and i've heard and observed great results with the Millennia
> HV-3. but i don't have enough experience to know if the Neumanns
> "like" the Millennia in the same way that a U87 likes being mated with
> a 1073.
I use Millennia HV-3B with KM183's, IMO a good pairing, no complaints.
Mike
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
On 2 Aug 2004 22:59:00 -0700, in rec.audio.pro you wrote:
>lots of m's and n's!
>
>but seriously, i was wondering how Neumann mics (KM-84, U87, TLM-103
>etc) tend to pair up with the Millennia preamp. i really like Neumann
>mics, and i've heard and observed great results with the Millennia
>HV-3. but i don't have enough experience to know if the Neumanns
>"like" the Millennia in the same way that a U87 likes being mated with
>a 1073.
Depends on the mic. I'm not a fan of the KM-184 into an HV-3, but
adore our KM-84s into HV-3. Monte tried a KM-84 into an HV-3 and said
it didn't sound right. Go figure.
We've got a Klaused U87 which into an HV-3 is magic on my voice. But
I've heard a stock U87 into an HV-3 that wasn't my cup of tea. A
current favorite stage vocal path uses a KM-105 into HV-3 -- rock
constant timbre from breath to scream.
I've tried KM-100 collette series mics (KM-130, KM-140, etc.) into
HV-3 and almost always prefer Schoeps CMC, Sennheiser MKH, DPA 4000,
or Josephson 600 mics in their place. Then again, our BLUE restored
M49 into an HV-3 is like butter wrapped in silk on female voice.
Bottom line -- it's always a new day with mic and preamp mating on a
new program in a new room with new talent. Gotta try 'em and see.
JL
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:36:50 -0400, John La Grou wrote
(in article <dfb0h0dm57rfs9mq7c1acia0ta56mh5koi@4ax.com> ):
> On 2 Aug 2004 22:59:00 -0700, in rec.audio.pro you wrote:
>
>> lots of m's and n's!
>>
>> but seriously, i was wondering how Neumann mics (KM-84, U87, TLM-103
>> etc) tend to pair up with the Millennia preamp. i really like Neumann
>> mics, and i've heard and observed great results with the Millennia
>> HV-3. but i don't have enough experience to know if the Neumanns
>> "like" the Millennia in the same way that a U87 likes being mated with
>> a 1073.
>
>
> Depends on the mic. I'm not a fan of the KM-184 into an HV-3, but
> adore our KM-84s into HV-3. Monte tried a KM-84 into an HV-3 and said
> it didn't sound right. Go figure.
>
> We've got a Klaused U87 which into an HV-3 is magic on my voice. But
> I've heard a stock U87 into an HV-3 that wasn't my cup of tea. A
> current favorite stage vocal path uses a KM-105 into HV-3 -- rock
> constant timbre from breath to scream.
>
> I've tried KM-100 collette series mics (KM-130, KM-140, etc.) into
> HV-3 and almost always prefer Schoeps CMC, Sennheiser MKH, DPA 4000,
> or Josephson 600 mics in their place. Then again, our BLUE restored
> M49 into an HV-3 is like butter wrapped in silk on female voice.
>
> Bottom line -- it's always a new day with mic and preamp mating on a
> new program in a new room with new talent. Gotta try 'em and see.
>
> JL
The ISDN session I did last week with the STT-1 and a cmc641 was great for me
and the other end liked it as well.
Regards,
Ty Ford
-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at http://home.comcast.net/~tyreeford
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
I regularly use an STT-1 with several u87's and always seem to make
the client happy.
Between the U87's patterns and all the variety the STT1 offers, there
seems to be more than enough flexiblity available with that setup to
work well on most vocal apps. I'm not saying it's the best vocal chain
(as that doesn't exixt except on a per situation basis) but I'm saying
that it has yet to be "not great enought" that a client wished to take
time to change out the mic/mic pre combo.
I think there is alot to be said for having the ability to swap a
transformer in or out as well as
tube or solid state signal paths in addition to comp and eq
capability.
So, as for Nueman/Millenia combinations a U87 and STT1 seem to be a
very powerful one in my book.
Chris
wavetrap
genericaudioperson@hotmail.com (xy) wrote in message news:<6c38b64b.0408022159.114fadf0@posting.google.com>...
> lots of m's and n's!
>
> but seriously, i was wondering how Neumann mics (KM-84, U87, TLM-103
> etc) tend to pair up with the Millennia preamp. i really like Neumann
> mics, and i've heard and observed great results with the Millennia
> HV-3. but i don't have enough experience to know if the Neumanns
> "like" the Millennia in the same way that a U87 likes being mated with
> a 1073.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
How is the "resolution" of the KMS-105 into the HV-3? I'm into lots
of good-quality detail.
>
> We've got a Klaused U87 which into an HV-3 is magic on my voice. But
> I've heard a stock U87 into an HV-3 that wasn't my cup of tea. A
> current favorite stage vocal path uses a KM-105 into HV-3 -- rock
> constant timbre from breath to scream.
>
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
xy <genericaudioperson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>How is the "resolution" of the KMS-105 into the HV-3? I'm into lots
>of good-quality detail.
It's excruciatingly detailed. Ask Roger what the jazz festival tapes have
sounded like. (Admittedly there's a transformer splitter between the HV-3
and the KMS-105 on those tracks, but it still sounds like the KMS-105).
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
On 4 Aug 2004 18:12:38 -0400, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>xy <genericaudioperson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>How is the "resolution" of the KMS-105 into the HV-3? I'm into lots
>>of good-quality detail.
>
>It's excruciatingly detailed.
What he said. In a good way.
JL
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
John La Grou <jl@jps.net> wrote:
>On 4 Aug 2004 18:12:38 -0400, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>>xy <genericaudioperson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>How is the "resolution" of the KMS-105 into the HV-3? I'm into lots
>>>of good-quality detail.
>>
>>It's excruciatingly detailed.
>
>What he said. In a good way.
Maybe not in a good way. At the jazz festival, it was a good way for
some of the performers, but there were a couple that had some odd slapping
and clicking sounds in their mouth that really got exaggerated.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
I use an HV3 with a pair of KM140s quite regularly for recording grand piano &
the combination always satisfies. The detail is wonderful & the dynamics are
dramatic.
Scott Fraser
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
In article <cesbko$t01$1@panix2.panix.com> kludge@panix.com writes:
> Maybe not in a good way. At the jazz festival, it was a good way for
> some of the performers, but there were a couple that had some odd slapping
> and clicking sounds in their mouth that really got exaggerated.
Yeah, man! Listen to that RESOLUTION! (to some, this is more important
than a pleasing voice)
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
In article <znr1091708971k@trad>, Mike Rivers <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote:
>
>In article <cesbko$t01$1@panix2.panix.com> kludge@panix.com writes:
>
>> Maybe not in a good way. At the jazz festival, it was a good way for
>> some of the performers, but there were a couple that had some odd slapping
>> and clicking sounds in their mouth that really got exaggerated.
>
>Yeah, man! Listen to that RESOLUTION! (to some, this is more important
>than a pleasing voice)
And you know, this past year I had an RCA ribbon sitting on the stands by the
side of the stage, and not a single vocalist wanted to use it. Everybody
had to have something they could hold in their hand. Sure sounded nice on
horns, though.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
thanks Chris,
does the Origin have the ability to make a "true" HV-3 preamp, or is
it a modded HV-3 when you select solid state and no other sections?
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
thanks for the insights, Mr. Dorsey.
would it be "weird" to use the KMS-105 as a studio vocal mic? It's
built/marketed for live use, but maybe if you're seeking high
resolution it could be good?
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
In article <6c38b64b.0408052209.6bbb9671@posting.google.com> genericaudioperson@hotmail.com writes:
> would it be "weird" to use the KMS-105 as a studio vocal mic?
It's never weird to use a mic in the studio (or any place else) if it
helps you to achieve your goal. People use SM-58s in the studio
because the singer gets things out of that mic that he can't get out
of a prized vintage tube or ribbon mic firmly mounted on a stand.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
xy <genericaudioperson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>would it be "weird" to use the KMS-105 as a studio vocal mic? It's
>built/marketed for live use, but maybe if you're seeking high
>resolution it could be good?
Try it and see. It's basically Neumann's attempt to get something that
sounds like a U87 on-axis but still has an extremely tight pattern and
extremely flat off-axis response.
It doesn't sound all that much like a U87, but it still has the pitched up
top end thing going on, and it does have that modern vocal sound. But you
can't move it around and get different sounds like you can with the U87,
where you can use the uneven off-axis response to your benefit.
I could definitely see using the KM-105 in a studio vocal application where
you've got someone singing with the band and you want isolation. It really
shines for that kind of thing, and it's a very sharp and etched vocal sound.
You do need to convince performers not to stick it right up in their face,
though. It will sound awful if you treat it like an SM58.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
in article BD3B340B.73C%ten.nozirev@dlywsinhoj.com, JoVee at
ten.nozirev@dlywsinhoj.com wrote on 8/8/04 1:33 AM:
> The AKG585 and oddly the Neumann 105 both are nice at minimising that (as is
Apologies for brainfart...
that should of course read
The AKG535...
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
JoVee wrote:
> It's odd... that gotta-handhold 'cabaret thang' hurts so many.
> Especially when they're defaulting to the jam-it-in-the-mouth
> technique that usually eliminates the nasals and they sound like a
> prox-hump-clogged-sinus demo.
And you can't see her face!
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
The milennia is an excellent choice and I see it in many of the finest
studios. It is nice to have a variety of preamps, and there are now
many excellent ones available. The Great River is highly regarded;
and for the feeling of being inside the microphone, the Audio Upgrades
stand alone unit cannot be beat. Both of these last two will drive
ribbons as well.
jj
On 2 Aug 2004 22:59:00 -0700, genericaudioperson@hotmail.com (xy)
wrote:
>lots of m's and n's!
>
>but seriously, i was wondering how Neumann mics (KM-84, U87, TLM-103
>etc) tend to pair up with the Millennia preamp. i really like Neumann
>mics, and i've heard and observed great results with the Millennia
>HV-3. but i don't have enough experience to know if the Neumanns
>"like" the Millennia in the same way that a U87 likes being mated with
>a 1073.
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
I'm not sure if it's a "true" HV3 preamp or not but I'm sure John at
Millenia would
be happy to answer any of your questions. I know when I was interested
in buying a pair
he was very helpful and informative.
I do know Millenia's site lists alot of info about the STT1 and it
mentions the dual preamp paths as... "TWIN MIC PREAMP PATHS — M-2b
VACUUM TUBE & HV-3 SOLID STATE ".
What I can say is a pair of STT1's has given me the best acoustic
guitar and piano recording's
I've done yet.
Best regards,
Chris
wavetrap
genericaudioperson@hotmail.com (xy) wrote in message news:<6c38b64b.0408052207.19347e38@posting.google.com>...
> thanks Chris,
>
> does the Origin have the ability to make a "true" HV-3 preamp, or is
> it a modded HV-3 when you select solid state and no other sections?
There are 1170 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

