Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (
More info?)
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:35:55 GMT, "OldDog" <OldDog@citypound.com> wrote:
>
>"Pluvious" <Pluvious@knowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:1vn2v0tb802r915vi64n553v7ivci429su@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:52:50 GMT, "boomer" <boom6spam@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> >EA just killed MoH: Pacific Assault = DEAD
>> >
>>
>>http://www.forumplanet.com/planetmedalofhonor/topic.asp?fid=4441&tid=158435
>9
>> >
>> >http://www.mohadmin.com/forum/showthread.php?p=21756#post21756
>> >
>>
>> Thank god.. I'm not sure I could stomach another WWII game. I'm so
>> sick of War games. Bring back the Sci-Fi I say!!
>>
>> Pluvious
>>
>>
>
>Sci-Fi? That's been done so many times that it's done. Burnt. Cooked.
>Rehashed. And fried some more.
>
>Quake 1, 2
Quake 1 isn't really as Sci-Fi. While it does have a Sci-Fi pretense, the
actual game itself is based around modern as opposed to futuristic
weaponry. The exception is the Lightning Gun, but that's about it really.
It, along with a few other games listed, qualify as Sci-Fa (Science
Fantasy).
>There's more I'm sure; this is just a few that I could think of off the top
>of my head. Maybe another genre that's hasn't been over used would be
>better?
In a way, aren't all setting genres a bit overused?
Any well designed setting won't look bad. The Descent series (excluding
The Mercury Mission in Descent 3) and Red Faction both have a good enough
Sci-Fi setting that you won't worry about the genre being overused. On the
other hand, Crime Cities tends to look quite silly as it looks like the
developers were desperatly trying to make their setting look unique.