I'd just like some clarification. Maybe there's something I'm missing. Take this for example...
http://home.cisco.com/en-us/products/family?icid=store_home_cat_image_routers
They rate them like "good for basic networking" or "great for streaming HD video and gaming". Is this a way of misleading advertisement (to get someone to think just because they game they need this router instead of a basic one)? I mean yeah it'd be great for those things (streaming HD video and gaming) if it were all LAN. But let's be honest, most households are usually in the 2-10 Mbps range. No one has 100-1,000 Mbps (no typical residential home). So that means no matter how fast your LAN, your Internet connection is going to be the final determinate on how fast your connection is. So wouldn't any router technically do for gaming or hd video (like of the linksys lineup example)? Or like I said earlier, am I missing something?
Update: I also realize there are physical things like better wireless range or gigabit Ethernet that would make buying router A more expensive than router B. I can also understand the web configuration page having more features available as well. But I still think a lot of it's a lie.
http://home.cisco.com/en-us/products/family?icid=store_home_cat_image_routers
They rate them like "good for basic networking" or "great for streaming HD video and gaming". Is this a way of misleading advertisement (to get someone to think just because they game they need this router instead of a basic one)? I mean yeah it'd be great for those things (streaming HD video and gaming) if it were all LAN. But let's be honest, most households are usually in the 2-10 Mbps range. No one has 100-1,000 Mbps (no typical residential home). So that means no matter how fast your LAN, your Internet connection is going to be the final determinate on how fast your connection is. So wouldn't any router technically do for gaming or hd video (like of the linksys lineup example)? Or like I said earlier, am I missing something?
Update: I also realize there are physical things like better wireless range or gigabit Ethernet that would make buying router A more expensive than router B. I can also understand the web configuration page having more features available as well. But I still think a lot of it's a lie.