No GeForce 7 in 2005

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

http://www.techspot.com/story16735.html

No GeForce 7 in 2005?

NVIDIA remains extremely quiet about its forthcoming products, but its
likely that they will not release a new graphics architecture earlier
than in late 2005. GeForce 6 technology will carry the company
throughout 2005.

"In terms of the core discreet desktop graphics (58% of revenue)
franchise, NVIDIA will not release a new architecture until the end of
2005. This could allow ATI Technologies a window of superior
performance if its gets its R520 products out on time (mid-2005).
Overall, we expect little movement in desktop discreet market share in
2005 between NVIDIA and ATI Technologies." - Research and investment
firm Goldman Sachs.

It is known that the company is readying its code-named NV47 visual
processing unit, a massively revamped GeForce 6 architecture with 24
pixel pipelines. Expected sometime in spring 2005, NV47 is (of course)
still GeForce 6 architecture. How NV47 will compare with ATI's R520
product is currently unknown.
However, NVIDIA remains positive about 2005.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On 27 Jan 2005 10:14:34 -0800, "nv55" <nvidianv55@mail.com> wrote:

>http://www.techspot.com/story16735.html
>
>No GeForce 7 in 2005?
>
>NVIDIA remains extremely quiet about its forthcoming products, but its
>likely that they will not release a new graphics architecture earlier
>than in late 2005. GeForce 6 technology will carry the company
>throughout 2005.
>
>"In terms of the core discreet desktop graphics (58% of revenue)
>franchise, NVIDIA will not release a new architecture until the end of
>2005. This could allow ATI Technologies a window of superior
>performance if its gets its R520 products out on time (mid-2005).
>Overall, we expect little movement in desktop discreet market share in
>2005 between NVIDIA and ATI Technologies." - Research and investment
>firm Goldman Sachs.
>

Idiot analysts.

With SLI load-sharing available and proven and many SLI-motherboards
waiting in the wings, no need for a new nVidia architecture. More
important to process-shrink the current GF6800 family for higher-yield
(lower-cost), lower power and/or faster speed.

John Lewis

>It is known that the company is readying its code-named NV47 visual
>processing unit, a massively revamped GeForce 6 architecture with 24
>pixel pipelines. Expected sometime in spring 2005, NV47 is (of course)
>still GeForce 6 architecture. How NV47 will compare with ATI's R520
>product is currently unknown.
>However, NVIDIA remains positive about 2005.
>

 

[NaDa]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

John Lewis wrote:

> On 27 Jan 2005 10:14:34 -0800, "nv55" <nvidianv55@mail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.techspot.com/story16735.html
>>
>>No GeForce 7 in 2005?
>>
>>NVIDIA remains extremely quiet about its forthcoming products, but its
>>likely that they will not release a new graphics architecture earlier
>>than in late 2005. GeForce 6 technology will carry the company
>>throughout 2005.
>>
>>"In terms of the core discreet desktop graphics (58% of revenue)
>>franchise, NVIDIA will not release a new architecture until the end of
>>2005. This could allow ATI Technologies a window of superior
>>performance if its gets its R520 products out on time (mid-2005).
>>Overall, we expect little movement in desktop discreet market share in
>>2005 between NVIDIA and ATI Technologies." - Research and investment
>>firm Goldman Sachs.
>>
>
>
> Idiot analysts.
>
> With SLI load-sharing available and proven and many SLI-motherboards
> waiting in the wings, no need for a new nVidia architecture. More
> important to process-shrink the current GF6800 family for higher-yield
> (lower-cost), lower power and/or faster speed.
>
> John Lewis

John, what's your take on the power consumption level with the SLI-mode?