In pcmark 2001 (cpu 4325,mem 2584,hdd 621) someone told me that the hdd score was VERY VERY LOW. Does anyone know if it is indeed very low, and tell me why cuz my HDD is supposed to be pretty fast.
My system is this: ece k7s5a mobo w/sis 735 chipset, retail amd XP 1800+, 256 MB DDR ram, Maxtor 7200 rpm ata 133 HDD running off an att 133 pci card with a promise chipset,gainward geforce 4 ti4200,creative live value soundcard. the HDD is configured to master on IDE 1 of the ata 133 pci card. a 12x burner is master on IDE 2 of the pci card, and a 32x burner is master on IDE 1 of the mobo. Win xp pro is freshly installed so fragmentation shouldn't be an issue. HOWEVER, the HDD has 2 partitions... the primary is 3 GB where the OS is installed, the second partition is where all programs and data is stored. Partition 1 is formatted with NTFS and partition 2 is a holdover from a previous win 98se installation and is formatted with fat32. Not sure if that would make any difference. The only think I can think is that having the drive on the pci card is messing up the perfromance. so why is my HDD so slow???
My system is this: ece k7s5a mobo w/sis 735 chipset, retail amd XP 1800+, 256 MB DDR ram, Maxtor 7200 rpm ata 133 HDD running off an att 133 pci card with a promise chipset,gainward geforce 4 ti4200,creative live value soundcard. the HDD is configured to master on IDE 1 of the ata 133 pci card. a 12x burner is master on IDE 2 of the pci card, and a 32x burner is master on IDE 1 of the mobo. Win xp pro is freshly installed so fragmentation shouldn't be an issue. HOWEVER, the HDD has 2 partitions... the primary is 3 GB where the OS is installed, the second partition is where all programs and data is stored. Partition 1 is formatted with NTFS and partition 2 is a holdover from a previous win 98se installation and is formatted with fat32. Not sure if that would make any difference. The only think I can think is that having the drive on the pci card is messing up the perfromance. so why is my HDD so slow???