Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > In-ear phones for monitoring - but not "buds"

In-ear phones for monitoring - but not "buds"

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - In-ear phones for monitoring - but not "buds"

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I'm looking for a reaonably good-quality pair of cans on a budget,
except what I want is the type of thing that has two *in-ear* things,
joined together by a band that goes over the top of your head, much
like on a normal set of phones, so that the earpieces can't flop
around separately (I hate those sparate bud things, because they pull
out so easily, and they are a fiddle to put in - and the wires are
usually too thin etc., and I lose them or tread on them.

I want a flat response, for monitoring my multi-track digital
recording. Thanks.

Jack

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

PS
What I'm looking for will look something like these:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obido [...] 70-2962201

Thanks again,
Jack

Reply to Jack
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

PPS,
Something in the Sony MDR range might do...

Reply to Jack

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

To the best of my knowledge, what you're looking for does not exist. I know of
no high-quality earphones of the sort you want. All those that are of monitoring
quality (or claim to be), such the Shure or Etymotic, do not have the headband.

The cheapest "really good" headphones I've heard are the Sennheiser PX 100. But
they don't go in your ear canal.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:27:47 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<williams@nwlink.com> wrote:

>>To the best of my knowledge, what you're looking for does not exist. I know of
>>no high-quality earphones of the sort you want. All those that are of monitoring
>>quality (or claim to be), such the Shure or Etymotic, do not have the headband.
>>
>>The cheapest "really good" headphones I've heard are the Sennheiser PX 100. But
>>they don't go in your ear canal.

William, many thanks for the tip. I think I'll probably buy a pair of
the Sennheiser PX 100's..

Jack

Reply to Jack
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:27:47 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<williams@nwlink.com> wrote:

>>To the best of my knowledge, what you're looking for does not exist. I know of
>>no high-quality earphones of the sort you want. All those that are of monitoring
>>quality (or claim to be), such the Shure or Etymotic, do not have the headband.
>>
>>The cheapest "really good" headphones I've heard are the Sennheiser PX 100. But
>>they don't go in your ear canal.

PS,
I took a look at these and the description said "Bass tube for
powerful, punchy bass". That sounds like something I don't want'; I
want a flat response...

jack

Reply to Jack
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:42:13 GMT, JackAsprey@ntlworld.com (jack)
wrote:

>>PS,
>>I took a look at these and the description said "Bass tube for
>>powerful, punchy bass". That sounds like something I don't want'; I
>>want a flat response...

Sorry; my mistake; that description was for the Sennheiser PX200.
Anyone know what the difference is between the PX100 and the PX200?

Thanks
Jack

Reply to Jack

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

> Sorry; my mistake; that description was for the Sennheiser PX200.
> Anyone know what the difference is between the PX100 and the PX200?

The 100 is "open-aire." The 200 is closed (or something). I haven't heard the
200, but some people have commented that it is more colored than the 100.

YMMV. Listen before you purchase.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:42:45 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<williams@nwlink.com> wrote:

>>> Sorry; my mistake; that description was for the Sennheiser PX200.
>>> Anyone know what the difference is between the PX100 and the PX200?
>>
>>The 100 is "open-aire." The 200 is closed (or something). I haven't heard the
>>200, but some people have commented that it is more colored than the 100.

Thanks for the info. Yes, I've read a review saying that the 100 is
noisy for 'other people' i.e., it leaks a lot of sound out. That could
be a problem for me because I need them for monitoring while dubbing
into a mic. The mic may pick up the headphone output. Not good..

Regards

Jack

Reply to Jack

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

<< JackAsprey@ntlworld.com (jack) >>
<< PPS,
Something in the Sony MDR range might do.. >>

The Grado's are very very good. I have the SR60's with sennheiser
replacement earpads, they're the least expensive of the line. Open ear
headphones and the Grado audiophile quality is obvious, even for the budget $69
models.

http://www.8thstreet.com/product_s [...] &Submit=go


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I use Sony MDR-V700

great pair of headphones!!!

jen

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > In-ear phones for monitoring - but not "buds"
Go to:

There are 1276 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them