Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > recording solo piano
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

i would like some recommendations on solo piano recording

i have a grand piano in a room with 10 foot ceilings and wood floors. one
blanket up on the wall near the bass end of the piano.

the piano is extremely rich and warm erring almost slightly to too warm. two
octaves below middle c it is very muddy then gets better in the bass.

my first attempt was really awful, using coles ribbons and an old ampex tube
preamp into a masterlink. i had wrongly assumed from my rock recording days
that warmer is better, and for this application it sounded horrible, much
too muddy. i then tried using a soundcraft spirit with the coles and it
sounded a bit better.

then i switched to a pair of km 184's/tube pre about 6 inches away from the
lowest bass and hightest trebled note. this got better. still not a great
sound.

then i used 184s into the spirit and this is the best sound so far with the
mics about a foot and a half above the piano over the bass and treble. the
more brittle the sound of the mic and the pre the better the sound is
getting. i am guessing to compensate for the extreme rich sound of the
piano. and i have concluded that the tube preamp i was using was totally
wrong for the sound i wanted and had way too much bump in the low mids and
not enough clarity. it was great for kick drums and bass for rock.

there is still a little bit of boxiness to the sound which could be the room
or it could be the preamp.

i love the sound of the old art tatum capitol and decca recordingings. he is
playing extremely dynamically and you get to hear every note crisply and it
never sounds too loud or too soft. obviously they were recording to tape
which is something i might try next to get some natural tape compression. i
have access to an ampex 440 2 track. by pulling the mics away from the piano
i am getting a more even sound without using compression, but it still
sounds a little bit harsh sometimes.


i have been thinking about getting a pair of much better preamps in hopes
that this will give me a tighter crispier sound. things i'm wondering about
are whether getting better a/d converters would help, sound treatment for
the room, which mic pre's would be good for the sound i am going for,
better mic placement, whether outboard compression might help, and does
anyone know what kind of equipment was used in the 40's and 50's to record
solo piano.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

for a brighter piano sound,Try taking the lid off the piano.
Keep both mics about a foot above the hammers.
one near the treble and stings and one above the low/mid section. mics should
be about 2 feet apart.
move em more towards the treble end for brighter and towards the bass section
for warmer.
Craig Calistro
CalistroMusic.com
Pro Audio Sales

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"anon" <anonymousm@nyc.rr.com>

> i would like some recommendations on solo piano recording
>
What kind of music??

What is the size of the room besides the ceeling height?

I'd use any pair of spread Omni's placed 1-4 feet appart (even with a
Jecklin disc), 8 to 15 feet out from the middle of the rim of the piano and
anywhere from 7 to 12 feet high..

I hate the mikes inside the lid thingy, mostly because it does not let the
instrument speak. Even a pair of (Crown) PZM on the floor, up too a couple
of feet infront of the insstrument is better, and often works very well in a
smallish room..

The mike pre is a lesser concern as long as it's sound is not to vissible..

/ptr


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.745 / Virus Database: 497 - Release Date: 2004-08-27

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

How about getting a piano technician in to get your piano sounding more like
what you want? If you can't get the sound you like in the room, it's going
to be very hard to create it with a microphone.

Peace,
Paul

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

<< mics should
be about 2 feet apart. >>

Or coincident if you care about phase & mono compatibility.


Scott Fraser

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Paul Stamler wrote:

> How about getting a piano technician in to get your piano
> sounding more like what you want? If you can't get the sound
> you like in the room, it's going to be very hard to create
> it with a microphone.

Seconded! - also a terser sounding piano will imo generally record
better than one that is too reverberant.

> Paul


Kind regards

Peter Larsen

--
*******************************************
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
*******************************************

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Get the piano fixed, then record it. There are three nice mic setups, but
the piano has to sound right. Try over the player's shoulders so the mics
hear what the player is hearing, or coincident inside of the box with full
stick (placement is your preference), or mono outside the curve with a nice
mic (again, specific placement is your preference) in a good room. And hang
that blanket somewhere else.

KM 184s are good for a piano in a mix, but KM84s are better. The list
really starts getting expensive from there. For all practical purposes,
I've fooled lots of very good players with MXL 603s in a coincident pair at
the hammers about 6" up, but my experience seriously runs in jazz. If it's
classical, I opt for mono outside of the piano. JoVee has gotten good
results from a single PZM mounted to the top with half stick augmented by
84s (I set the 84s).

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"anon" <anonymousm@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:dt5_c.30849$Ot3.8171@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> i would like some recommendations on solo piano recording
>
> i have a grand piano in a room with 10 foot ceilings and wood floors. one
> blanket up on the wall near the bass end of the piano.
>
> the piano is extremely rich and warm erring almost slightly to too warm.
two
> octaves below middle c it is very muddy then gets better in the bass.
>
> my first attempt was really awful, using coles ribbons and an old ampex
tube
> preamp into a masterlink. i had wrongly assumed from my rock recording
days
> that warmer is better, and for this application it sounded horrible, much
> too muddy. i then tried using a soundcraft spirit with the coles and it
> sounded a bit better.
>
> then i switched to a pair of km 184's/tube pre about 6 inches away from
the
> lowest bass and hightest trebled note. this got better. still not a great
> sound.
>
> then i used 184s into the spirit and this is the best sound so far with
the
> mics about a foot and a half above the piano over the bass and treble. the
> more brittle the sound of the mic and the pre the better the sound is
> getting. i am guessing to compensate for the extreme rich sound of the
> piano. and i have concluded that the tube preamp i was using was totally
> wrong for the sound i wanted and had way too much bump in the low mids and
> not enough clarity. it was great for kick drums and bass for rock.
>
> there is still a little bit of boxiness to the sound which could be the
room
> or it could be the preamp.
>
> i love the sound of the old art tatum capitol and decca recordingings. he
is
> playing extremely dynamically and you get to hear every note crisply and
it
> never sounds too loud or too soft. obviously they were recording to tape
> which is something i might try next to get some natural tape compression.
i
> have access to an ampex 440 2 track. by pulling the mics away from the
piano
> i am getting a more even sound without using compression, but it still
> sounds a little bit harsh sometimes.
>
>
> i have been thinking about getting a pair of much better preamps in hopes
> that this will give me a tighter crispier sound. things i'm wondering
about
> are whether getting better a/d converters would help, sound treatment for
> the room, which mic pre's would be good for the sound i am going for,
> better mic placement, whether outboard compression might help, and does
> anyone know what kind of equipment was used in the 40's and 50's to record
> solo piano.
>
>
>
>
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

i agree with getting the piano 'fixed', and that terser pianos record
better.

however i have put many thousands into the piano already. every time a
technician messes with a piano you run the risk of them making it worse.
and i think it just sounds like it sounds. the only thing i might consider
is to have the hammers filed down to make the sound brighter, but this
presents new problems as every time the hammers are worked on the piano must
be played for many months in order to even out the sound and make new
grooves on the hammers.

i heard that 84's are a bit darker than 184's so this might be worth a shot.
i'm thinking about using some sm 57's just to hear the difference, who knows
maybe it will work well.

the lid is completely off the piano and it sounds best this way

the blanket has helped the sound alot so i'm wondering why that person
suggested moving it. in fact i'm considering another blanket at the tail end
wall of the piano.

the music is mainly jazz to answer whoever asked that question. i think a
romantic classical player would be happy with the first sounds i was
getting.

the last recording i did was pretty good, so i'm getting close. i think it's
just a matter of more clarity, crispness, maybe the right type of
compression (tape or outboard).

Reply to ANON

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:36:09 +0200, anon wrote:

> i would like some recommendations on solo piano recording
>
> i have a grand piano in a room with 10 foot ceilings and wood floors.
> one blanket up on the wall near the bass end of the piano.
>
> the piano is extremely rich and warm erring almost slightly to too warm.
> two octaves below middle c it is very muddy then gets better in the
> bass.

A muddy sound in the high basses normally is a room acoustics problem.

You could try to improve room acoustics. I get good results with ecophon:
http://www.ecophon-us.com/template [...] __4778.asp
Important to choose a panel with a flat absorbion curve. The ecophon
master panels do deliver a nice curve.

After that you could try to regulate the piano to sound perfect for the
room.

For recording I always avoid components that advertise with some form of
clouration like "warm". They normally add colouration and distortion.

--
Chel van Gennip
Visit Serg van Gennip's site http://www.serg.vangennip.com

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > recording solo piano
Go to:

There are 1211 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them