Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)
My system is an Athlon 64 3200 (939) with 512k of PC3200, I just replaced my
GF4400 with a plain vanilla GF6800. I load up the BF2 demo last night and it
runs fine on the default 800x600@60, all details on low. Well, I turn it up
to 1024x768@75 and put the details on high, and it is as choppy as hell.
I was just a bit disappointed after having put in a 6800. Alt-Tab to desktop
and my task manager shows that the page file use is in 700+ range and I'm
getting a warning that the system is low on memory.
Will another stick of 512k solve the problem? It would seem so.
My system is an Athlon 64 3200 (939) with 512k of PC3200, I just replaced my
GF4400 with a plain vanilla GF6800. I load up the BF2 demo last night and it
runs fine on the default 800x600@60, all details on low. Well, I turn it up
to 1024x768@75 and put the details on high, and it is as choppy as hell.
I was just a bit disappointed after having put in a 6800. Alt-Tab to desktop
and my task manager shows that the page file use is in 700+ range and I'm
getting a warning that the system is low on memory.
Will another stick of 512k solve the problem? It would seem so.