Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Rane PE-17 or Ashly PQX-571, any opinions?

Rane PE-17 or Ashly PQX-571, any opinions?

Forum Audio : Pro Audio - Rane PE-17 or Ashly PQX-571, any opinions?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Any constructive opinions?
(Other than putting both in the "PA junk" category?)

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

I feel like a hook is slowly flowing past me, tempting me to bite...

If you actually have some legitamate question about parametric equalizers,
please be more specific, and provide some background about what use they are
needed.


Best regards,

John

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

RLS <passerbydeletethis@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>Any constructive opinions?
>(Other than putting both in the "PA junk" category?)

They both work. They are both pretty good as "PA junk" gear goes. They
can both be upgraded a little bit with some tinkering. I'd probably pick
the Ashly personally.

In that price range, though, you could get a used Orban. I'd take the
Orban over either.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Apologies for not being more specific: I didn't mean to start a
controversy.

I want to experiment with a parametric eq to control bass response in
a home setting.

The common feaure of these two devices are that their filters don't
have constrained frequency ranges: they can be all be set, say, to
operate in the 20Hz-200Hz range.

Most other (affordable) devices don't offer this flexibiltiy.

Regards,
- rls
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:42:27 GMT, "John Halliburton"
<j_challiburton@ameritech.net> wrote:

>I feel like a hook is slowly flowing past me, tempting me to bite...
>
>If you actually have some legitamate question about parametric equalizers,
>please be more specific, and provide some background about what use they are
>needed.
>
>Best regards,
>John

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

"RLS" <passerbydeletethis@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:1ik5k0pnc07go2d0244tr7vnkpt3ibs1gl@4ax.com

> I want to experiment with a parametric eq to control bass response in
> a home setting.
>
> The common feaure of these two devices are that their filters don't
> have constrained frequency ranges: they can be all be set, say, to
> operate in the 20Hz-200Hz range.
>
> Most other (affordable) devices don't offer this flexibiltiy.

Last time I wanted a parametric to fool with, I picked up a Behringer PEQ
2200 NIB for $59 including shipping on eBay. On the bench and in initial
use, it is just fine. Don't know how it will hold up, but for the price...
It's not in a mission-critical application.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Thanks for the advice.

As I wrote above:
the difference between these two and the Orban is that their filters
don't have constrained frequency ranges: they can all be set, say, to
operate in the 20Hz-200Hz range

On 11 Sep 2004 00:47:40 -0400, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

>RLS <passerbydeletethis@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>In that price range, though, you could get a used Orban. I'd take the
>Orban over either.
>--scott

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

RLS <passerbydeletethis@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>I want to experiment with a parametric eq to control bass response in
>a home setting.

Never mind, then. That doesn't work very well.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Scott Dorsey wrote:

> They both work. They are both pretty good as "PA junk" gear goes. They
> can both be upgraded a little bit with some tinkering. I'd probably pick
> the Ashly personally.

What sort of tinkering? Just curious, because I own the Ashly. I'd assume
swapping out opamps? What replacement would you suggest?

thanks.

Reply to Agent86
- 0 +

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

Scott Dorsey wrote:

> They both work. They are both pretty good as "PA junk" gear goes. They
> can both be upgraded a little bit with some tinkering. I'd probably pick
> the Ashly personally.

What sort of tinkering? Just curious, because I own the Ashly. I'd assume
swapping out opamps? What replacement would you suggest?

thanks.

Reply to Agent86

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

agent86 <jakethedog@backyard.net> wrote:
>Scott Dorsey wrote:
>
>> They both work. They are both pretty good as "PA junk" gear goes. They
>> can both be upgraded a little bit with some tinkering. I'd probably pick
>> the Ashly personally.
>
>What sort of tinkering? Just curious, because I own the Ashly. I'd assume
>swapping out opamps? What replacement would you suggest?

Swapping out opamps, and using better quality capacitors in the time
constants. I _think_ the Ashly also benefits from running ground busses
and cleaning the ground noise up a little bit, as well as installing
improved supply decoupling. And I think (like the Orban 622) you run
into stability problems with better supply decoupling unless you first
improve the grounds.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

 

<< As I wrote above:
the difference between these two and the Orban is that their filters
don't have constrained frequency ranges: they can all be set, say, to
operate in the 20Hz-200Hz range >>

Two of the Orban 642B's four bands cover that range, & the 2 channels can be
internally cascaded to provide 8 bands, four of which cover your desired range.


Scott Fraser

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Audio > Pro Audio > Rane PE-17 or Ashly PQX-571, any opinions?
Go to:

There are 519 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Content
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them