Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Counterstrike Source: yawn, SOS w/better graphics?

Counterstrike Source: yawn, SOS w/better graphics?

Forum Games General : PC Gaming - Counterstrike Source: yawn, SOS w/better graphics?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
Anonymous   07-12-2005 at 12:37:20 PM

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

 

Counterstrike Source is the most boring piece of work I've ever played.
Is/are there any gameplay differences between Counterstrike Source and the
original Counterstrike? I'm just about to un-install Counterstrike Source.
The only thing I use it for now is benchmarking...

--
there is no .sig

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Andrew   07-12-2005 at 01:46:59 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:37:20 GMT, "Doug" <pigdos@nospam.com> wrote:

>Counterstrike Source is the most boring piece of work I've ever played.
>Is/are there any gameplay differences between Counterstrike Source and the
>original Counterstrike? I'm just about to un-install Counterstrike Source.
>The only thing I use it for now is benchmarking...

It is basically the same, just with updated graphics and physics. It
wasn't designed or advertised as being anything different.
--
Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.

Reply to Andrew
Anonymous   07-12-2005 at 11:22:52 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

 

Doug wrote:
> Counterstrike Source is the most boring piece of work I've ever played.
> Is/are there any gameplay differences between Counterstrike Source and the
> original Counterstrike? I'm just about to un-install Counterstrike Source.
> The only thing I use it for now is benchmarking...
>

Ditto, I find it terribly boring after about 10-20 minutes play.
Battlefield 2, while not as pure a form of combat, is about a million
times more fun.

Reply to Anonymous
hank   07-12-2005 at 08:18:26 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

 

The beauty of CounterStike Source is the fact that its almost
indentical game play wise to the orginal. With physics and better
graphics its slighty better.

One cannot argue that CounterStrike has been the most successful online
game to date bar none.

Reply to hank
nostromo   07-13-2005 at 01:41:08 PM
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

 

Thus spake "Hank" <admin@cellsounds.co.nz>, 12 Jul 2005 14:18:26 -0700, Anno
Domini:

>The beauty of CounterStike Source is the fact that its almost
>indentical game play wise to the orginal. With physics and better
>graphics its slighty better.
>
>One cannot argue that CounterStrike has been the most successful online
>game to date bar none.

Nice try ;-p

--
A killfile is a friend for life.

Replace 'spamfree' with the other word for 'maze' to reply via email.

Reply to nostromo
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Counterstrike Source: yawn, SOS w/better graphics?
Go to:

There are 1107 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.345 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?