Hi,
my Global teacher asked me to do a bit of research on the games Civilization, Civilization 2, and Civilization 3. Which one is the most historically accurate and what time periods does each cover?
uhm..... what? whatever you native language is, there are translating programs out there. type your language in one of the translators and it will spit out comprehendable english, then just cut and paste.
First, civ3? Doesn't exist, does it? Civ1 was pooish, Civ2 was cool as. What you call Civ3 is either "Call to Power" or "Alpha Centauri". The latter of which is great.
Anyway, i'd say civ2. Civ1 was too limited. Call to power i never played, but alpha... was sci-fi, so definitely not histroically accurate.
<i>Strange assignment!</i>
<b>If it were up to me, twinings would make coffee</b>
Do any of you even read the original post?!? He asked which was the most <i>Historically accurate</i>, not which one was the coolest or the most fun or has the best graphics.
I would not call any of them "historically accurate". Some parts of the game obviously have elements of true civilizations, but the games were designed to be <i>games</i>, not a history lesson.
Last weekend I've got my Civ III. Definately the best Civ ever!!! Cool graphics and much better diplomacy + resource management (you need iron sources to produce legions, and they deplete in time !!!).
Anyway, back to orignal post, again Civ 3 is the most historically accurate one if you ask me. I could only reach to 1400AD but the units and structures are better (in terms of history). For example, depending on your nationality, you get special units. If you chose French side, you get Musketman (regular unit) + Musketeer (special unit). But there is a reduction on wonders (no marco polo for instance).
<font color=blue>Get a T-Bird...
Impressive CPU + House heater in one package. What do you need more?</font color=blue>
Civ3 is the most accurate, ignore the Call to Power Crap. I dont know how you could even call Civ remotely accurate however. The Americans have only been around for over 200years.
But if you ever get around to playing it and want to conquor pick the germans go Commie and build Panzers which will roll over everything.
None of them are historically acurate. The rate of development of nations in the game is a matter of how well you play and you can advance faster or slower than civilizations have in the real world. You can also still have odd situations like a tank fighting against a swordsman, and we don't run into too many situations like that in the real world (except maybe german tanks vs. polish calvelry in ww2)
<i>Mommy that dog is trying to jump over that other dog but he keeps not making it</i>
Don't forget Italian tanks and rifles vs Ethopian spearmen in WWII. The Italians lost by the way. It was only when the Germans decided to back up the Italians that the Axis powers won.
--------------
Knowan likes you. Knowan is your friend. Knowan thinks you're great.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.