Chrome sequel Specforce has been released

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

x-no-archive: yes

Chrome sequel Specforce has been released

http://www.specforcethegame.com/

for those always winning about not wanting to give money to
the retail middle man you can do it with this game cause
techland sells it also directly so put your money where your
mouth is

--
post made in a steam-free computer
i said "NO" to valve and steam

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

x-no-archive: yes

Johnny Bravo wrote:

> Why are you even telling people that they can avoid
> rewarding that retail channel you love

so things like you stop giving the "more profits" for
developers excuse to promote steam
steam fanatics like you love to say steam is good cause
this way you can give all the money to the developer
and none to the middle man retailer when the truth is
others besides valve are doing the same without the need
to use abusive systems like steam

you want to buy directly from the developer so you can
reward only him? ok fine but NO YOU DON'T NEED STEAM
FOR IT

you can buy directly from the developers like techland
with no need for steam
and there are many other developers that sell directly
like techland with no need for steam
but the very important difference between techland and
valve is valve FORCES YOU TO BUY FROM THEM creating a
MONOPOLY in pc games and techland give you the option
to also buy there own titles in other places like retail
stores

as for me i do prefer to buy games in retail stores
that's my choice but i do respect others wanting it
different
lets respect diversity
lets maintain diversity
lets defend competition in the pc game market
that's the important message
competition and no acceptance for monopoly which is exactly
what valve with steam doesn't want
down with valve!
down with steam!
long live pc games monopoly free!

--
post made in a steam-free computer
i said "NO" to valve and steam

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Johnny Bravo <baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:qdhmh1ld4a1i9jlsi61guecviee1jibqpr@4ax.com:

> On 3 Sep 2005 23:36:58 -0700, "steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>x-no-archive: yes
>>
>>Johnny Bravo wrote:
>>
>>> Why are you even telling people that they can avoid
>>> rewarding that retail channel you love
>>
>>so things like you stop giving the "more profits" for
>>developers excuse to promote steam
>
>>steam fanatics like you love to say steam is good cause
>
> You sir, are a complete idiot.
>
> The closest I have EVER come to being a "steam fanatic" is telling
> you that it is Valve's choice how to distribute their product. If you
> don't like it don't buy it.
>
> I didn't, but that doesn't give me the right to try to tell Valve
> what to do.
>
>>this way you can give all the money to the developer
>>and none to the middle man retailer when the truth is
>>others besides valve are doing the same without the need
>>to use abusive systems like steam
>
> Good for them.
>
>>you want to buy directly from the developer so you can
>>reward only him? ok fine but NO YOU DON'T NEED STEAM
>>FOR IT
>
> I do if I want to buy directly from valve. Much in the same way
> that I'd expect to be buying an Xbox if I really wanted to play an
> Xbox only game. Since I'm not willing to go that far to play a Xbox
> game, they won't have my business. But I'm not about to tell a
> company that they should be required to make a Windows version just
> because I'm not going to buy an Xbox.
>
you should give up man, you make some well thought out and valid points,
but common sense isn't something that has anything to do with difools
rants, hee looks to elicit a reaction from people, and thats it, if u
cheak a few weeks back he made a post that noone replied to so he decided
to reply himself and complain. just give up hes not worth the waste of
bandwidth

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Johnny Bravo <baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:r3evh1t6fnn7g4o8mir9k5dv12jqmum4vd@4ax.com:

> On 06 Sep 2005 23:57:24 GMT, Stone Monkey
> <tenny2k@NOSPAMERSrtennant.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> you should give up man, you make some well thought out and valid
>> points,
>>but common sense isn't something that has anything to do with difools
>>rants, hee looks to elicit a reaction from people, and thats it, if u
>>cheak a few weeks back he made a post that noone replied to so he
>>decided to reply himself and complain. just give up hes not worth the
>>waste of bandwidth
>
> I do it mainly as a timewaster, when I've a few minutes to kill and
> don't have time to start something working on a serious project I'll
> fire off a few posts to Usenet. difool is amusing at times, I'm just
> wading through the chaff.
>
>

fair enough then