Hi everybody
From quite a long time this site is using for testing & comparison only the IBM model 60GXP; this is quite an old model and it should not be present in the last article - at least not without his big brother 120GXP.
Tell me if I am wrong.
Another observation: I am quite an old reader of this site. I am checking it on a daily basis. I must say that the quality of the articles in the last year (this is only an approximation) is going down. Many times I have check the graphs and then read the conclusion and I have found that they didn't match. I think that Tom was much more carefull with details that the present editors. Tom, if you are NOT so busy please come back and write some articles.
And one last technicall question, for you teach-savy: THG said that this drive has 60Gb/plat. Even so there is a 80Gb model. How is this possible?
Regards,
Razvan
Razvan
From quite a long time this site is using for testing & comparison only the IBM model 60GXP; this is quite an old model and it should not be present in the last article - at least not without his big brother 120GXP.
Tell me if I am wrong.
Another observation: I am quite an old reader of this site. I am checking it on a daily basis. I must say that the quality of the articles in the last year (this is only an approximation) is going down. Many times I have check the graphs and then read the conclusion and I have found that they didn't match. I think that Tom was much more carefull with details that the present editors. Tom, if you are NOT so busy please come back and write some articles.
And one last technicall question, for you teach-savy: THG said that this drive has 60Gb/plat. Even so there is a 80Gb model. How is this possible?
Regards,
Razvan
Razvan