I have two 20 GB drives that I want to put into a RAID 0 setup along with one 60 GB, one for use primarily as a system disc and the other primarily for data storage. My questions are:
How much higher is the failure rate for a HDD in a RAID 0 setup than for a single drive?
What would be the performance difference using the RAID setup as the Photoshop scratch disk and the primary drive vs. using the single 60 GB drive as the scratch disc.
So basically, which drive/setup do I (would you) run as the system drive and which one would you use for data storage? For performance in Photoshop I should obviously(?) use the RAID for data storage and as the scratch disc, but how much risk does that generate vs. using RAID 0 as the system drive and using the single drive for data/scratch or leaving the system disc as the scratch drive?
failure rates are the same as single drives. nothing has changed, but as you have two of them the changes of failure have essentially doubled as one drive death = array death.
shouldnt be much of a problem provided you backup often.
regarding scratch files, personally i would get as much system ram as possible first, reducing the need for swap/scratch files.
<b>"True communication is possible only between equals, because inferiors are consistently rewarded for telling their superiors pleasant lies than for telling the truth."</b>
486 lappy 120Mb internal drive, few bad sectors, still going fine.
2Gb seagate 4200rpm LBA drive. was still working fine when i sold it 1.5 years ago.
16.8Gb IBM 16GP. still working fine when i gave it away last christmas.
60gxp dead after a year. First bad sector after around 3 months.
d740x 9 months old. a-ok
800jb 3-4 months old. a-ok
<b>"True communication is possible only between equals, because inferiors are consistently rewarded for telling their superiors pleasant lies than for telling the truth."</b>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.