Luckily, I didn’t have any trouble justifying it to the lady. She said “its so pretty!” and that was that!
I picked it up a few weeks ago for $1200. I buy a lot from NewEgg, but I got this from a local store, CompUSA for the same price. I wanted to have an easy return if it didn’t fulfill my needs.
To answer your questions:
1. The only games I’ve tried so far are the new Rainbow 6 and MS Flight Sim 2004. I’m using a FX 5700 Ultra, which is struggling, but still looks pretty smooth.
2. I haven’t noticed any ghosting, but I’m only getting about 30fps or less, until I get a new video card.My CRT was quicker, but the LCD makes up for it with clarity.
3. I used a Viewsonic 21” CRT before this, but ran it at 1280. It was not even close to the sharpness of the 213T, but did a bit better in distinguishing between slight variances in black/grey levels. Still the 213T can pass a standard gray scale calibration such as this one here:
http://www.dpreview.com/images/grayscale.gif
4. The only thing I don’t like about the 213T is the fact that I need to run at 1600 all the time. Although the 213T does better than most at lower resolutions, it’s not as clear as my CRT was at 1280. The 213T looks much better than the CRT at 1600, such a high resolution makes me feel sick on a CRT.
5. No regrets, and I don’t get headaches using it, like I did after spending hours in front of my CRT.
6. I mainly use it for high-end graphic design work, manipulating gigantic, ultra-high resolution images in Photoshop. I also use it for web site design work. It’s currently hooked up to 8 computers on a KVM switch. And one directly through DVI.
Honestly, games weren’t my primary concern, but from what I’ve seen, the monitor does just fine.